AMOM vs. ROBT
AMOM (QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF) and ROBT (First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while ROBT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index. AMOM is actively managed, while ROBT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMOM returned 11.70%/yr vs -0.08%/yr for ROBT. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMOM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ROBT.
Performance
AMOM vs. ROBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMOM achieves a 26.78% return, which is significantly higher than ROBT's 3.51% return.
AMOM
- 1D
- -4.33%
- 1M
- 5.97%
- YTD
- 26.78%
- 6M
- 24.27%
- 1Y
- 40.35%
- 3Y*
- 26.54%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- —
ROBT
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- -3.90%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 17.15%
- 3Y*
- 6.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.08%
- 10Y*
- —
AMOM vs. ROBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF | 26.78% | 7.69% | 35.79% | 27.06% | -26.29% | 13.08% | 53.81% | 9.64% |
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 3.51% | 15.16% | -0.41% | 27.77% | -34.94% | 9.91% | 46.18% | 9.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMOM and ROBT is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2019 | 0.75 |
The correlation between AMOM and ROBT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
AMOM vs. ROBT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMOM
ROBT
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
AMOM
ROBT
Industrials
AMOM
ROBT
Energy
AMOM
ROBT
Healthcare
AMOM
ROBT
Communication Services
AMOM
ROBT
Financial Services
AMOM
ROBT
Consumer Defensive
AMOM
ROBT
Basic Materials
AMOM
ROBT
-
Consumer Cyclical
AMOM
ROBT
Real Estate
AMOM
ROBT
-
Utilities
AMOM
ROBT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMOM vs. ROBT — Risk / Return Rank
AMOM
ROBT
AMOM vs. ROBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMOM | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.13 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 0.80 | +2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.70 | 2.22 | +8.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMOM vs. ROBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, smaller than the maximum ROBT drawdown of -44.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMOM and ROBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMOM | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.68% | -44.47% | +4.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.10% | -21.66% | +8.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.26% | -27.68% | -2.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.68% | -43.26% | +3.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.33% | -10.93% | +6.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.75% | -15.91% | +5.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | 7.75% | -3.97% |
Volatility
AMOM vs. ROBT - Volatility Comparison
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) has a higher volatility of 12.24% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) at 10.81%. This indicates that AMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMOM | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.24% | 10.81% | +1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.66% | 19.33% | +0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.29% | 24.76% | -0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.26% | 25.49% | -1.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.22% | 25.59% | -0.37% |
AMOM vs. ROBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMOM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ROBT's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMOM vs. ROBT - Dividend Comparison
AMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while ROBT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.72% | 0.74% | 24.31% | 5.51% | 0.00% |
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.68% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.06% | 0.17% | 0.42% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMOM and ROBT have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMOM has higher volatility (12.24%) compared to ROBT (10.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMOM dropped -39.68% vs ROBT's -44.47%.
On 5-year performance, AMOM leads with 11.70% vs -0.08% for ROBT. On fees, ROBT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ROBT has been the lower-risk option at 10.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AMOM has performed better with a 11.70% return vs -0.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROBT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AMOM.
AMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for ROBT.
AMOM is categorized as Momentum, while ROBT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMOM and 0.65% for ROBT.
AMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMOM and ROBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer