AMOM vs. ROBT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

AMOM (QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF) and ROBT (First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while ROBT is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index. AMOM is actively managed, while ROBT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMOM returned 9.25%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for ROBT. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AMOM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ROBT.

Performance

AMOM vs. ROBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMOM achieves a 15.87% return, which is significantly higher than ROBT's 6.10% return.

AMOM

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: -4.25%
• 6M: 11.05%
• YTD: 15.87%
• 1Y: 23.53%
• 3Y*: 20.81%
• 5Y*: 9.25%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.64%

ROBT

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: -2.19%
• 6M: 6.05%
• YTD: 6.10%
• 1Y: 12.26%
• 3Y*: 6.14%
• 5Y*: 0.69%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF	$150.21K	$582.70K	$376.87K
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF	$2.54M	$2.27M	$2.92M

AMOM vs. ROBT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF	15.87%	7.69%	35.79%	27.06%	-26.29%	13.08%	53.81%	9.64%
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF	6.10%	15.16%	-0.41%	27.77%	-34.94%	9.91%	46.18%	9.98%

Correlation

The correlation between AMOM and ROBT is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2019	0.75

The correlation between AMOM and ROBT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

AMOM vs. ROBT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMOM	ROBT
Technology	56.7%	53.3%
Industrials	19.5%	23.1%
Energy	10.0%	1.6%
Basic Materials	8.2%	-
Communication Services	7.4%	3.8%
Financial Services	6.2%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	1.2%
Healthcare	4.5%	8.8%
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Utilities	1.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.1%	6.6%

Return for Risk

AMOM vs. ROBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMOM

AMOM Risk / Return Rank: 36
AMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
AMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
AMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 33
AMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
AMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 42

ROBT

ROBT Risk / Return Rank: 20
ROBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
ROBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
ROBT Omega Ratio Rank: 20
ROBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
ROBT Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMOM vs. ROBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMOM	ROBT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	0.41	+0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.24	0.72	+0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.08	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	0.47	+0.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.62	1.23	+3.39

AMOM vs. ROBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMOM Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is higher than the ROBT Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMOM and ROBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMOM vs. ROBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, smaller than the maximum ROBT drawdown of -44.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMOM and ROBT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMOM	ROBT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.68%	-44.47%	+4.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.03%	-21.66%	+3.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.26%	-27.68%	-2.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.68%	-43.26%	+3.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.57%	-8.70%	-3.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.72%	-15.83%	+5.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.90%	8.29%	-3.39%

Volatility

AMOM vs. ROBT - Volatility Comparison

QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) has a higher volatility of 11.89% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) at 5.83%. This indicates that AMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMOM	ROBT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.89%	5.83%	+6.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.74%	19.41%	+4.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.91%	24.93%	+2.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.99%	25.56%	-0.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.59%	25.53%	+0.06%

AMOM vs. ROBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMOM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ROBT's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMOM vs. ROBT - Dividend Comparison

AMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, more than ROBT's 0.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF	0.04%	0.09%	0.00%	0.47%	0.72%	0.74%	24.31%	5.51%	0.00%
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF	0.02%	0.00%	0.68%	0.23%	0.35%	0.06%	0.17%	0.42%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMOM and ROBT in my portfolio?

AMOM and ROBT have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMOM or ROBT?

AMOM has higher volatility (11.89%) compared to ROBT (5.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMOM dropped -39.68% vs ROBT's -44.47%.

Which ETF is better, AMOM or ROBT?

On 5-year performance, AMOM leads with 9.25% vs 0.69% for ROBT. On fees, ROBT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ROBT has been the lower-risk option at 5.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMOM or ROBT?

Over the 5-year period, AMOM has performed better with a 9.25% return vs 0.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMOM or ROBT?

ROBT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AMOM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMOM or ROBT?

AMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.02% for ROBT.

What is the main difference between AMOM and ROBT?

AMOM is categorized as Momentum, while ROBT is Artificial Intelligence. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMOM and 0.65% for ROBT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.