AMOM vs. MEIAX
AMOM (QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF) and MEIAX (MFS Value Fund) are both funds - AMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while MEIAX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by MFS. Over the past 5 years, AMOM returned 12.75%/yr vs 8.76%/yr for MEIAX. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMOM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for MEIAX.
Performance
AMOM vs. MEIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMOM achieves a 32.52% return, which is significantly higher than MEIAX's 6.36% return.
AMOM
- 1D
- 2.30%
- 1M
- 10.77%
- YTD
- 32.52%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 48.40%
- 3Y*
- 28.43%
- 5Y*
- 12.75%
- 10Y*
- —
MEIAX
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 6M
- 5.64%
- 1Y
- 15.73%
- 3Y*
- 12.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.88%
AMOM vs. MEIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF | 32.52% | 7.69% | 35.79% | 27.06% | -26.29% | 13.08% | 53.81% | 9.64% |
MEIAX MFS Value Fund | 6.36% | 12.97% | 11.60% | 7.92% | -6.25% | 25.11% | 3.71% | 13.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMOM and MEIAX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2019 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AMOM and MEIAX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMOM vs. MEIAX — Risk / Return Rank
AMOM
MEIAX
AMOM vs. MEIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and MFS Value Fund (MEIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMOM | MEIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.26 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 2.34 | +1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.88 | 8.04 | +4.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMOM vs. MEIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, smaller than the maximum MEIAX drawdown of -52.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMOM and MEIAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMOM | MEIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.68% | -52.85% | +13.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.10% | -6.78% | -6.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.26% | -13.26% | -17.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.68% | -17.72% | -21.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.42% | +1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.75% | -6.53% | -4.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 1.97% | +1.80% |
Volatility
AMOM vs. MEIAX - Volatility Comparison
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) has a higher volatility of 11.18% compared to MFS Value Fund (MEIAX) at 3.21%. This indicates that AMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMOM | MEIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.18% | 3.21% | +7.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.18% | 7.89% | +11.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.92% | 10.65% | +13.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.18% | 13.94% | +10.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.17% | 16.56% | +8.61% |
AMOM vs. MEIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMOM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MEIAX's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMOM vs. MEIAX - Dividend Comparison
AMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than MEIAX's 8.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.72% | 0.74% | 24.31% | 5.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MEIAX MFS Value Fund | 8.96% | 9.34% | 9.10% | 8.21% | 7.36% | 3.10% | 2.42% | 2.97% | 3.36% | 3.87% | 2.84% | 5.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMOM and MEIAX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMOM has higher volatility (11.18%) compared to MEIAX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMOM dropped -39.68% vs MEIAX's -52.85%.
AMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMOM and MEIAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer