AMOM vs. FDL

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

AMOM (QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - AMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. AMOM is actively managed, while FDL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMOM returned 9.65%/yr vs 13.96%/yr for FDL. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AMOM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FDL.

Performance

AMOM vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AMOM having a 19.28% return and FDL slightly lower at 18.60%.

AMOM

• 1D: -1.66%
• 1M: -3.09%
• 6M: 16.68%
• YTD: 19.28%
• 1Y: 25.98%
• 3Y*: 22.85%
• 5Y*: 9.65%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.07%

FDL

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 4.47%
• 6M: 5.75%
• YTD: 18.60%
• 1Y: 26.71%
• 3Y*: 19.02%
• 5Y*: 13.96%
• 10Y*: 11.08%
• ALL TIME*: 8.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF	$168.78K	$545.85K	$368.98K
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund	$48.97M	$49.30M	$42.41M

AMOM vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF	19.28%	7.69%	35.79%	27.06%	-26.29%	13.08%	53.81%	9.64%
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund	18.60%	14.79%	17.98%	2.94%	6.66%	26.10%	-4.30%	10.92%

Correlation

The correlation between AMOM and FDL is -0.19, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.19
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2019	0.31

The correlation between AMOM and FDL shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AMOM vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMOM	FDL
Technology	56.7%	4.3%
Industrials	19.5%	3.6%
Energy	10.0%	11.1%
Basic Materials	8.2%	0.4%
Communication Services	7.4%	11.2%
Financial Services	6.2%	13.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	24.3%
Healthcare	4.5%	11.7%
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Utilities	1.1%	15.4%
Consumer Cyclical	1.1%	4.4%

Return for Risk

AMOM vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMOM

AMOM Risk / Return Rank: 35
AMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
AMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
AMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 33
AMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
AMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 42

FDL

FDL Risk / Return Rank: 89
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMOM vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMOM	FDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	2.26	-1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.38	3.41	-2.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.39	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.45	6.28	-4.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.19	14.78	-9.60

AMOM vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMOM Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMOM and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMOM vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMOM and FDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMOM	FDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.68%	-65.93%	+26.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.03%	-4.27%	-13.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.26%	-12.24%	-18.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.68%	-16.46%	-23.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.99%	-1.60%	-8.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.72%	-9.59%	-1.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.02%	1.81%	+3.21%

Volatility

AMOM vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) has a higher volatility of 11.52% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 4.48%. This indicates that AMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMOM	FDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.52%	4.48%	+7.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.02%	8.63%	+15.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.18%	11.88%	+16.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.07%	14.43%	+10.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.62%	17.16%	+8.46%

AMOM vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMOM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMOM vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

AMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than FDL's 3.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF	0.03%	0.09%	0.00%	0.47%	0.72%	0.74%	24.31%	5.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund	3.58%	4.04%	4.96%	4.58%	3.58%	4.59%	4.48%	3.75%	3.97%	3.18%	2.93%	3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMOM and FDL in my portfolio?

AMOM and FDL have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMOM or FDL?

AMOM has higher volatility (11.52%) compared to FDL (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMOM dropped -39.68% vs FDL's -65.93%.

Which ETF is better, AMOM or FDL?

On 5-year performance, FDL leads with 13.96% vs 9.65% for AMOM. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMOM or FDL?

Over the 5-year period, FDL has performed better with a 13.96% return vs 9.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMOM or FDL?

FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AMOM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMOM or FDL?

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 0.03% for AMOM.

What is the main difference between AMOM and FDL?

AMOM is categorized as Momentum, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMOM and 0.43% for FDL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.