AMBA vs. NOG
AMBA (Ambarella, Inc.) and NOG (Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.) are both stocks. AMBA operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while NOG operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, AMBA returned 3.49%/yr vs -7.03%/yr for NOG. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMBA vs. NOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMBA achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly higher than NOG's -10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, AMBA has outperformed NOG with an annualized return of 3.49%, while NOG has yielded a comparatively lower -7.03% annualized return.
AMBA
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 17.48%
- 6M
- 11.62%
- YTD
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 15.58%
- 3Y*
- -1.42%
- 5Y*
- -5.30%
- 10Y*
- 3.49%
NOG
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -7.12%
- 6M
- -12.00%
- YTD
- -10.36%
- 1Y
- -35.02%
- 3Y*
- -14.51%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- -7.03%
AMBA vs. NOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMBA Ambarella, Inc. | 9.12% | -2.61% | 18.68% | -25.47% | -59.47% | 120.96% | 51.62% | 73.13% | -40.46% | 8.54% |
NOG Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. | -10.36% | -38.20% | 4.84% | 25.54% | 54.51% | 136.72% | -62.56% | 3.54% | 10.24% | -25.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMBA and NOG is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2012 | 0.20 |
The correlation between AMBA and NOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AMBA:
$3.39B
NOG:
$2.01B
AMBA:
-$1.62
NOG:
-$6.34
AMBA:
8.19
NOG:
1.20
AMBA:
5.56
NOG:
1.02
AMBA:
$405.19M
NOG:
$1.52B
AMBA:
$238.32M
NOG:
$450.66M
AMBA:
-$69.43M
NOG:
$73.21M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMBA vs. NOG — Risk / Return Rank
AMBA
NOG
AMBA vs. NOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMBA | NOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.89 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | -0.85 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.59 | -1.62 | +2.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMBA vs. NOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMBA drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, smaller than the maximum NOG drawdown of -98.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBA and NOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMBA | NOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.65% | -98.96% | +17.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.06% | -41.43% | -7.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.74% | -55.08% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.65% | -55.08% | -26.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.65% | -92.98% | +11.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.35% | -92.85% | +28.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.51% | -69.82% | +21.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.62% | 21.78% | +2.84% |
Volatility
AMBA vs. NOG - Volatility Comparison
Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) has a higher volatility of 35.14% compared to Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG) at 14.14%. This indicates that AMBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMBA | NOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.14% | 14.14% | +21.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.00% | 32.39% | +24.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.60% | 45.38% | +27.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.11% | 49.25% | +15.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.86% | 70.57% | -12.71% |
Dividends
AMBA vs. NOG - Dividend Comparison
AMBA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMBA Ambarella, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOG Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. | 9.72% | 8.38% | 4.41% | 4.02% | 2.86% | 0.75% |
Financials
AMBA vs. NOG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ambarella, Inc. and Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
AMBA and NOG have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMBA has higher volatility (35.14%) compared to NOG (14.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMBA dropped -81.65% vs NOG's -98.96%.
AMBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.20 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMBA and NOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer