PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NOG vs. ET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


NOGET
YTD Return14.60%35.42%
1Y Return18.12%42.22%
3Y Return (Ann)24.66%34.68%
5Y Return (Ann)17.95%19.62%
10Y Return (Ann)-9.10%2.38%
Sharpe Ratio0.632.76
Sortino Ratio1.083.90
Omega Ratio1.141.50
Calmar Ratio0.241.86
Martin Ratio2.1322.78
Ulcer Index9.88%1.91%
Daily Std Dev33.33%15.77%
Max Drawdown-98.96%-87.81%
Current Drawdown-85.86%-0.35%

Fundamentals


NOGET
Market Cap$4.10B$59.03B
EPS$8.48$1.36
PE Ratio4.8512.68
PEG Ratio0.560.55
Total Revenue (TTM)$2.16B$83.66B
Gross Profit (TTM)$900.25M$14.03B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.46B$12.39B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between NOG and ET is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

NOG vs. ET - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, NOG achieves a 14.60% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 35.42% return. Over the past 10 years, NOG has underperformed ET with an annualized return of -9.10%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 2.38% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.75%
12.91%
NOG
ET

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NOG vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NOG, currently valued at 0.63, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.63
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NOG, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.08
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NOG, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.14
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NOG, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.24
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NOG, currently valued at 2.13, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.13
ET
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ET, currently valued at 2.76, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.76
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ET, currently valued at 3.90, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.90
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ET, currently valued at 1.50, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.50
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ET, currently valued at 1.86, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.86
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ET, currently valued at 22.78, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0022.78

NOG vs. ET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOG Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOG and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.63
2.76
NOG
ET

Dividends

NOG vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

NOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, less than ET's 7.40% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
NOG
Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.
3.94%4.02%2.86%1.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.40%8.96%7.33%7.44%17.28%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%3.19%

Drawdowns

NOG vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOG drawdown since its inception was -98.96%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOG and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-85.86%
-0.35%
NOG
ET

Volatility

NOG vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG) has a higher volatility of 13.44% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 4.25%. This indicates that NOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.44%
4.25%
NOG
ET

Financials

NOG vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items