PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMBA vs. MTDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMBA vs. MTDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Matador Resources Company (MTDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMBA achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly lower than MTDR's 22.72% return. Over the past 10 years, AMBA has underperformed MTDR with an annualized return of 3.49%, while MTDR has yielded a comparatively higher 9.53% annualized return.


AMBA

1D
-1.38%
1M
17.48%
6M
11.62%
YTD
9.12%
1Y
15.58%
3Y*
-1.42%
5Y*
-5.30%
10Y*
3.49%

MTDR

1D
-0.08%
1M
-4.25%
6M
23.27%
YTD
22.72%
1Y
0.99%
3Y*
0.56%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
9.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMBA vs. MTDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMBA
Ambarella, Inc.
9.12%-2.61%18.68%-25.47%-59.47%120.96%51.62%73.13%-40.46%8.54%
MTDR
Matador Resources Company
22.72%-22.31%0.37%0.57%55.83%207.33%-32.89%15.71%-50.11%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between AMBA and MTDR is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2012

0.25

Over the past year, the correlation between AMBA and MTDR has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMBA:

$3.39B

MTDR:

$6.38B

EPS

AMBA:

-$1.62

MTDR:

$3.89

PS Ratio

AMBA:

8.19

MTDR:

1.90

PB Ratio

AMBA:

5.56

MTDR:

1.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMBA:

$405.19M

MTDR:

$3.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMBA:

$238.32M

MTDR:

$3.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

AMBA:

-$69.43M

MTDR:

$1.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMBA vs. MTDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMBA
AMBA Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AMBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMBA Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AMBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMBA Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

MTDR
MTDR Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MTDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTDR Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MTDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTDR Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMBA vs. MTDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Matador Resources Company (MTDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMBAMTDRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.04

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

0.06

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.59

0.12

+0.48

AMBA vs. MTDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMBA Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is higher than the MTDR Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMBA and MTDR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMBA vs. MTDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMBA drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, smaller than the maximum MTDR drawdown of -96.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBA and MTDR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMBAMTDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.65%

-96.50%

+14.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.06%

-28.76%

-20.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.74%

-46.83%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.65%

-48.29%

-33.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.65%

-96.50%

+14.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.35%

-24.81%

-39.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.51%

-25.07%

-23.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.62%

14.27%

+10.35%

Volatility

AMBA vs. MTDR - Volatility Comparison

Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) has a higher volatility of 35.14% compared to Matador Resources Company (MTDR) at 9.39%. This indicates that AMBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMBAMTDRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.14%

9.39%

+25.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.00%

30.06%

+26.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.60%

40.37%

+32.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.11%

47.08%

+18.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.86%

64.91%

-7.05%

Dividends

AMBA vs. MTDR - Dividend Comparison

AMBA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MTDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AMBA
Ambarella, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MTDR
Matador Resources Company
2.80%3.09%1.51%1.14%0.52%0.34%

Financials

AMBA vs. MTDR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ambarella, Inc. and Matador Resources Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
100.36M
671.64M
(AMBA) Total Revenue
(MTDR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AMBA vs. MTDR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ambarella, Inc. and Matador Resources Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
58.4%
84.0%
Portfolio components
AMBA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported a gross profit of 58.59M and revenue of 100.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.

MTDR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Matador Resources Company reported a gross profit of 564.11M and revenue of 671.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.0%.

AMBA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported an operating income of -19.42M and revenue of 100.36M, resulting in an operating margin of -19.4%.

MTDR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Matador Resources Company reported an operating income of 46.82M and revenue of 671.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.

AMBA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported a net income of -18.09M and revenue of 100.36M, resulting in a net margin of -18.0%.

MTDR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Matador Resources Company reported a net income of -35.87M and revenue of 671.64M, resulting in a net margin of -5.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMBA and MTDR have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMBA has higher volatility (35.14%) compared to MTDR (9.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMBA dropped -81.65% vs MTDR's -96.50%.

AMBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.20 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMBA and MTDR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer