MTDR vs. LIT
MTDR (Matador Resources Company) is a stock, while LIT (Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF) is Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the Solactive Global Lithium Index. Over the past 10 years, MTDR returned 10.18%/yr vs 14.22%/yr for LIT. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MTDR vs. LIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MTDR having a 20.43% return and LIT slightly higher at 20.92%. Over the past 10 years, MTDR has underperformed LIT with an annualized return of 10.18%, while LIT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.22% annualized return.
MTDR
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -11.05%
- YTD
- 20.43%
- 6M
- 22.44%
- 1Y
- 5.87%
- 3Y*
- 2.67%
- 5Y*
- 8.54%
- 10Y*
- 10.18%
LIT
- 1D
- -5.01%
- 1M
- -8.03%
- YTD
- 20.92%
- 6M
- 17.98%
- 1Y
- 114.29%
- 3Y*
- 8.82%
- 5Y*
- 3.06%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
MTDR vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTDR Matador Resources Company | 20.43% | -22.31% | 0.37% | 0.57% | 55.83% | 207.33% | -32.89% | 15.71% | -50.11% | 20.85% |
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 20.92% | 60.05% | -19.19% | -12.18% | -29.91% | 36.74% | 127.88% | 3.27% | -28.63% | 64.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTDR and LIT is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MTDR and LIT has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTDR vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank
MTDR
LIT
MTDR vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matador Resources Company (MTDR) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTDR | LIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.49 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | 6.98 | -6.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.44 | 24.36 | -23.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTDR vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTDR drawdown since its inception was -96.50%, which is greater than LIT's maximum drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTDR and LIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTDR | LIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.50% | -65.91% | -30.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.76% | -16.46% | -12.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.83% | -53.01% | +6.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.29% | -65.91% | +17.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.50% | -65.91% | -30.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.22% | -15.46% | -10.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.07% | -33.56% | +8.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.42% | 4.71% | +8.71% |
Volatility
MTDR vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison
Matador Resources Company (MTDR) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) have volatilities of 12.12% and 11.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTDR | LIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.12% | 11.76% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.22% | 24.39% | +5.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.18% | 34.30% | +6.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.26% | 32.09% | +15.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.04% | 30.75% | +34.29% |
Dividends
MTDR vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison
MTDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than LIT's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.93% | 1.11% | 0.99% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 1.85% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.15% | 0.24% |
MTDR Matador Resources Company | 2.85% | 3.09% | 1.51% | 1.14% | 0.52% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MTDR and LIT have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTDR has higher volatility (12.12%) compared to LIT (11.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTDR dropped -96.50% vs LIT's -65.91%.
LIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTDR and LIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer