PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTDR vs. LIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MTDR vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matador Resources Company (MTDR) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MTDR having a 20.43% return and LIT slightly higher at 20.92%. Over the past 10 years, MTDR has underperformed LIT with an annualized return of 10.18%, while LIT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.22% annualized return.


MTDR

1D
-0.55%
1M
-11.05%
YTD
20.43%
6M
22.44%
1Y
5.87%
3Y*
2.67%
5Y*
8.54%
10Y*
10.18%

LIT

1D
-5.01%
1M
-8.03%
YTD
20.92%
6M
17.98%
1Y
114.29%
3Y*
8.82%
5Y*
3.06%
10Y*
14.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTDR vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTDR
Matador Resources Company
20.43%-22.31%0.37%0.57%55.83%207.33%-32.89%15.71%-50.11%20.85%
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
20.92%60.05%-19.19%-12.18%-29.91%36.74%127.88%3.27%-28.63%64.19%

Correlation

The correlation between MTDR and LIT is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between MTDR and LIT has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTDR vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTDR
MTDR Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MTDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTDR Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MTDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTDR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

LIT
LIT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
LIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIT Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
LIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIT Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTDR vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matador Resources Company (MTDR) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MTDRLITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.49

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

6.98

-6.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.44

24.36

-23.92

MTDR vs. LIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTDR Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the LIT Sharpe Ratio of 3.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTDR and LIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTDR vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTDR drawdown since its inception was -96.50%, which is greater than LIT's maximum drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTDR and LIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTDRLITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.50%

-65.91%

-30.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.76%

-16.46%

-12.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.83%

-53.01%

+6.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.29%

-65.91%

+17.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.50%

-65.91%

-30.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.22%

-15.46%

-10.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.07%

-33.56%

+8.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.42%

4.71%

+8.71%

Volatility

MTDR vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

Matador Resources Company (MTDR) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) have volatilities of 12.12% and 11.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTDRLITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.12%

11.76%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.22%

24.39%

+5.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.18%

34.30%

+6.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.26%

32.09%

+15.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.04%

30.75%

+34.29%

Dividends

MTDR vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

MTDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than LIT's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
0.40%0.49%0.93%1.11%0.99%0.22%0.40%1.85%2.52%3.26%2.15%0.24%
MTDR
Matador Resources Company
2.85%3.09%1.51%1.14%0.52%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MTDR and LIT have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTDR has higher volatility (12.12%) compared to LIT (11.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTDR dropped -96.50% vs LIT's -65.91%.

LIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTDR and LIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer