AM vs. WMB
AM (Antero Midstream Corporation) and WMB (The Williams Companies, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas Midstream industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 10 years, AM returned 7.20%/yr vs 18.64%/yr for WMB. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
AM vs. WMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AM achieves a 22.62% return, which is significantly higher than WMB's 19.95% return. Over the past 10 years, AM has underperformed WMB with an annualized return of 7.20%, while WMB has yielded a comparatively higher 18.64% annualized return.
AM
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 22.62%
- 6M
- 16.77%
- 1Y
- 19.29%
- 3Y*
- 32.87%
- 5Y*
- 24.10%
- 10Y*
- 7.20%
WMB
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- 19.95%
- 6M
- 17.36%
- 1Y
- 22.09%
- 3Y*
- 38.06%
- 5Y*
- 26.38%
- 10Y*
- 18.64%
AM vs. WMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AM Antero Midstream Corporation | 22.62% | 24.37% | 28.46% | 25.73% | 21.98% | 39.55% | 27.59% | -60.29% | -22.28% | -2.32% |
WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 19.95% | 14.91% | 62.35% | 11.86% | 32.83% | 38.36% | -8.20% | 14.18% | -23.88% | 2.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between AM and WMB is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2014 | 0.56 |
The correlation between AM and WMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AM:
$10.19B
WMB:
$87.55B
AM:
$0.85
WMB:
$2.28
AM:
24.99
WMB:
31.34
AM:
4.31
WMB:
1.63
AM:
8.12
WMB:
7.34
AM:
5.26
WMB:
6.76
AM:
$1.26B
WMB:
$11.92B
AM:
$620.66M
WMB:
$7.49B
AM:
$955.64M
WMB:
$6.88B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AM vs. WMB — Risk / Return Rank
AM
WMB
AM vs. WMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) and The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AM | WMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.18 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 1.79 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.18 | 3.88 | -0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AM | WMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 0.96 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 1.12 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | 0.60 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.23 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
AM vs. WMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AM drawdown since its inception was -93.01%, smaller than the maximum WMB drawdown of -98.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AM and WMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AM | WMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.01% | -98.03% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.67% | -12.36% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.98% | -12.36% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.91% | -23.01% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.01% | -68.08% | -24.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.68% | -9.84% | +1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.42% | -27.08% | -4.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.10% | 5.71% | +0.39% |
Volatility
AM vs. WMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) is 5.87%, while The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) has a volatility of 8.07%. This indicates that AM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AM | WMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.87% | 8.07% | -2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.39% | 15.75% | -1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.88% | 23.07% | -2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.55% | 23.62% | +2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.01% | 31.00% | +11.01% |
Dividends
AM vs. WMB - Dividend Comparison
AM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than WMB's 2.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AM Antero Midstream Corporation | 4.22% | 5.06% | 5.96% | 7.18% | 8.34% | 10.15% | 15.95% | 18.28% | 7.53% | 4.27% | 3.14% | 2.93% |
WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 2.83% | 3.33% | 3.51% | 5.14% | 5.17% | 6.30% | 7.98% | 6.41% | 6.17% | 3.94% | 5.39% | 9.53% |
Financials
AM vs. WMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Antero Midstream Corporation and The Williams Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AM vs. WMB - Profitability Comparison
AM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Antero Midstream Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 314.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
WMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.49B and revenue of 3.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.1%.
AM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Antero Midstream Corporation reported an operating income of 188.61M and revenue of 314.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 60.0%.
WMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.32B and revenue of 3.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 43.6%.
AM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Antero Midstream Corporation reported a net income of 118.27M and revenue of 314.21M, resulting in a net margin of 37.6%.
WMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 865.00M and revenue of 3.03B, resulting in a net margin of 28.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AM and WMB have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WMB has higher volatility (8.07%) compared to AM (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AM dropped -93.01% vs WMB's -98.03%.
WMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AM and WMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer