PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AM vs. URNM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AM vs. URNM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AM achieves a 27.68% return, which is significantly higher than URNM's 1.46% return.


AM

1D
1.65%
1M
0.18%
YTD
27.68%
6M
25.77%
1Y
26.85%
3Y*
35.17%
5Y*
24.98%
10Y*
7.74%

URNM

1D
-0.87%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
1.46%
6M
-1.45%
1Y
24.41%
3Y*
23.19%
5Y*
15.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AM vs. URNM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AM
Antero Midstream Corporation
27.68%24.37%28.46%25.73%21.98%39.55%27.59%72.11%
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
1.46%40.78%-14.13%57.80%-11.86%78.32%68.36%4.05%

Correlation

The correlation between AM and URNM is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019

0.34

Over the past year, the correlation between AM and URNM has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AM vs. URNM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AM
AM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
AM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
AM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
AM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
AM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

URNM
URNM Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
URNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNM Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
URNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNM Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AM vs. URNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMURNMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.12

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

0.63

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.29

1.48

+2.81

AM vs. URNM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AM Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the URNM Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AM and URNM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AM vs. URNM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AM drawdown since its inception was -93.01%, which is greater than URNM's maximum drawdown of -50.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AM and URNM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMURNMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.01%

-50.78%

-42.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.67%

-38.72%

+26.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.98%

-50.78%

+36.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.91%

-50.78%

+28.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.91%

-33.69%

+28.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.82%

-18.14%

-13.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.27%

16.54%

-10.27%

Volatility

AM vs. URNM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) is 5.69%, while Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) has a volatility of 17.96%. This indicates that AM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMURNMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.69%

17.96%

-12.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.28%

41.68%

-27.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.89%

52.32%

-31.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.43%

48.56%

-22.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.92%

47.03%

-5.11%

Dividends

AM vs. URNM - Dividend Comparison

AM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than URNM's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AM
Antero Midstream Corporation
4.05%5.06%5.96%7.18%8.34%10.15%15.95%18.28%7.53%4.27%3.14%2.93%
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
3.13%3.18%3.18%3.63%0.00%6.70%2.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AM and URNM have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URNM has higher volatility (17.96%) compared to AM (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AM dropped -93.01% vs URNM's -50.78%.

AM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AM and URNM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer