AM vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Performance
AM vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AM vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AM Antero Midstream Corporation | 28.30% | 24.37% | 28.46% | 25.73% | 21.98% | 39.55% | 27.59% | -60.29% | -22.28% | -2.32% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 17.51% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | -44.92% | 5.88% | -17.74% | -4.66% |
Fundamentals
AM:
$10.87B
ET:
$69.42B
AM:
$0.86
ET:
$1.37
AM:
26.32
ET:
13.90
AM:
8.64
ET:
0.82
AM:
5.51
ET:
1.42
AM:
$1.26B
ET:
$82.63B
AM:
$822.21M
ET:
$18.01B
AM:
$1.02B
ET:
$14.93B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AM achieves a 28.30% return, which is significantly higher than ET's 17.51% return. Over the past 10 years, AM has underperformed ET with an annualized return of 9.42%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 20.33% annualized return.
AM
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- YTD
- 28.30%
- 6M
- 19.06%
- 1Y
- 29.91%
- 3Y*
- 37.47%
- 5Y*
- 28.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.42%
ET
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- 17.51%
- 6M
- 16.34%
- 1Y
- 9.61%
- 3Y*
- 24.91%
- 5Y*
- 29.13%
- 10Y*
- 20.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AM vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank
AM
ET
AM vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AM | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.28 | 0.41 | +0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 0.72 | +1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.10 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 0.60 | +1.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.47 | 1.67 | +3.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AM | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 0.41 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | 1.15 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.56 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.35 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between AM and ET is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AM vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
AM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, less than ET's 6.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AM Antero Midstream Corporation | 3.99% | 5.06% | 5.96% | 7.18% | 8.34% | 10.15% | 15.95% | 18.28% | 7.53% | 4.27% | 3.14% | 2.93% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.97% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
Drawdowns
AM vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AM drawdown since its inception was -93.01%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AM and ET.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AM | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.01% | -87.81% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.98% | -17.33% | +3.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.91% | -25.82% | +3.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.01% | -72.82% | -20.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.45% | -3.30% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.80% | -25.95% | -5.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.82% | 6.24% | -0.42% |
Volatility
AM vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.02%. This indicates that AM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AM | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 5.02% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.03% | 11.78% | +2.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.47% | 23.83% | -0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.97% | 25.47% | +1.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.17% | 36.63% | +5.54% |
Financials
AM vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Antero Midstream Corporation and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AM vs. ET - Profitability Comparison
AM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Antero Midstream Corporation reported a gross profit of 209.19M and revenue of 314.67M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.5%.
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 5.78B and revenue of 22.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.8%.
AM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Antero Midstream Corporation reported an operating income of 187.18M and revenue of 314.67M, resulting in an operating margin of 59.5%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.37B and revenue of 22.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.
AM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Antero Midstream Corporation reported a net income of 51.93M and revenue of 314.67M, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.46B and revenue of 22.41B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.