AM vs. BSM
Compare and contrast key facts about Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) and Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AM or BSM.
Key characteristics
| AM | BSM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 24.38% | 1.10% |
| 1Y Return | 21.09% | -9.13% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 19.73% | 18.92% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 32.17% | 13.10% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.06 | -0.54 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.62 | -0.63 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.19 | 0.92 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.86 | -0.60 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.95 | -1.15 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.16% | 8.43% |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.40% | 18.05% |
| Max Drawdown | -89.37% | -75.59% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.14% | -9.73% |
Fundamentals
| AM | BSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.95B | $3.13B |
| EPS | $0.80 | $1.49 |
| PE Ratio | 18.05 | 9.98 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.17 | 1.22 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $1.15B | $291.29M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $723.83M | $205.38M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $879.04M | $201.07M |
Correlation
The correlation between AM and BSM is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
AM vs. BSM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AM achieves a 24.38% return, which is significantly higher than BSM's 1.10% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AM vs. BSM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) and Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AM vs. BSM - Dividend Comparison
AM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, less than BSM's 11.40% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AM Antero Midstream Corporation | 6.16% | 7.18% | 8.34% | 10.15% | 15.98% | 14.27% | 4.04% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BSM Black Stone Minerals, L.P. | 11.40% | 11.90% | 9.13% | 8.23% | 10.18% | 11.64% | 8.62% | 6.70% | 5.87% | 2.95% |
Drawdowns
AM vs. BSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AM drawdown since its inception was -89.37%, which is greater than BSM's maximum drawdown of -75.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AM and BSM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AM vs. BSM - Volatility Comparison
Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) has a higher volatility of 5.72% compared to Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) at 3.88%. This indicates that AM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AM vs. BSM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Antero Midstream Corporation and Black Stone Minerals, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities