PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALIL vs. OUSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALIL vs. OUSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Argent Focused Small Cap ETF (ALIL) and OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALIL achieves a 7.70% return, which is significantly higher than OUSM's 6.80% return.


ALIL

1D
-0.32%
1M
2.83%
YTD
7.70%
6M
7.61%
1Y
12.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OUSM

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.69%
YTD
6.80%
6M
6.94%
1Y
10.89%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALIL vs. OUSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ALIL and OUSM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2025

0.86

The correlation between ALIL and OUSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALIL vs. OUSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALIL
ALIL Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
ALIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALIL Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
ALIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALIL Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

OUSM
OUSM Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
OUSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSM Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALIL vs. OUSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Argent Focused Small Cap ETF (ALIL) and OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALILOUSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.15

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

1.19

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.80

3.47

-0.68

ALIL vs. OUSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALIL Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is comparable to the OUSM Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALIL and OUSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALILOUSMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

0.83

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.48

+0.22

Drawdowns

ALIL vs. OUSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALIL drawdown since its inception was -12.60%, smaller than the maximum OUSM drawdown of -39.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALIL and OUSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALILOUSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.60%

-39.84%

+27.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.60%

-9.21%

-3.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-1.67%

+1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-5.22%

+2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.32%

3.14%

+1.18%

Volatility

ALIL vs. OUSM - Volatility Comparison

Argent Focused Small Cap ETF (ALIL) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) at 3.66%. This indicates that ALIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALILOUSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.63%

3.66%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.50%

9.25%

+4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.50%

13.15%

+5.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

16.30%

+2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.92%

18.94%

-0.02%

ALIL vs. OUSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALIL has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than OUSM's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALIL vs. OUSM - Dividend Comparison

ALIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than OUSM's 2.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALIL
Argent Focused Small Cap ETF
0.44%0.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
2.07%2.09%1.62%1.64%1.98%1.55%2.02%1.99%2.63%2.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALIL and OUSM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALIL has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to OUSM (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALIL dropped -12.60% vs OUSM's -39.84%.

On 1-year performance, ALIL leads with 12.05% vs 10.89% for OUSM. On fees, OUSM is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, OUSM has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ALIL has performed better with a 12.05% return vs 10.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OUSM is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for ALIL.

OUSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 0.44% for ALIL.

They also come from different issuers: Argent and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for ALIL and 0.48% for OUSM.

OUSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALIL and OUSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer