ALIL vs. RB
ALIL (Argent Focused Small Cap ETF) and RB (ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ALIL is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Argent, while RB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Russell 2000. ALIL is actively managed, while RB is passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ALIL charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for RB.
Performance
ALIL vs. RB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALIL achieves a 7.70% return, which is significantly higher than RB's 6.76% return.
ALIL
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 7.70%
- 6M
- 7.61%
- 1Y
- 12.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RB
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 6.76%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALIL vs. RB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ALIL Argent Focused Small Cap ETF | 7.70% | 3.36% |
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 6.76% | 10.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALIL and RB is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALIL vs. RB — Risk / Return Rank
ALIL
RB
ALIL vs. RB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Argent Focused Small Cap ETF (ALIL) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALIL | RB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALIL | RB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 3.15 | -2.45 |
Drawdowns
ALIL vs. RB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALIL drawdown since its inception was -12.60%, which is greater than RB's maximum drawdown of -1.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALIL and RB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALIL | RB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.60% | -1.70% | -10.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.47% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -0.41% | -2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | — | — |
Volatility
ALIL vs. RB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALIL | RB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.50% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.50% | 6.21% | +12.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 6.21% | +12.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 6.21% | +12.71% |
ALIL vs. RB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALIL has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than RB's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
ALIL vs. RB - Dividend Comparison
ALIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than RB's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ALIL Argent Focused Small Cap ETF | 0.44% | 0.47% |
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 2.00% | 1.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ALIL and RB have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for ALIL.
RB has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.44% for ALIL.
ALIL is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RB is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Argent and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for ALIL and 0.58% for RB.
Find the right allocation for ALIL and RB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer