ALIL vs. ABIG
ALIL (Argent Focused Small Cap ETF) and ABIG (Argent Large Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ALIL is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Argent, while ABIG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Argent. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ALIL returned 12.05% vs 18.30% for ABIG. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ALIL charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ABIG.
Performance
ALIL vs. ABIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALIL achieves a 7.70% return, which is significantly higher than ABIG's 6.46% return.
ALIL
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 7.70%
- 6M
- 7.61%
- 1Y
- 12.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABIG
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 4.31%
- YTD
- 6.46%
- 6M
- 5.47%
- 1Y
- 18.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALIL vs. ABIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ALIL Argent Focused Small Cap ETF | 7.70% | 6.88% |
ABIG Argent Large Cap ETF | 6.46% | 16.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALIL and ABIG is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2025 | 0.73 |
The correlation between ALIL and ABIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALIL vs. ABIG — Risk / Return Rank
ALIL
ABIG
ALIL vs. ABIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Argent Focused Small Cap ETF (ALIL) and Argent Large Cap ETF (ABIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALIL | ABIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.25 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 1.34 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | 4.83 | -2.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALIL | ABIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 1.41 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 1.48 | -0.78 |
Drawdowns
ALIL vs. ABIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALIL drawdown since its inception was -12.60%, smaller than the maximum ABIG drawdown of -13.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALIL and ABIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALIL | ABIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.60% | -13.70% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.60% | -13.70% | +1.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -1.33% | +1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -2.24% | -0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 3.80% | +0.52% |
Volatility
ALIL vs. ABIG - Volatility Comparison
Argent Focused Small Cap ETF (ALIL) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to Argent Large Cap ETF (ABIG) at 3.39%. This indicates that ALIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALIL | ABIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 3.39% | +2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.50% | 10.01% | +3.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.50% | 13.07% | +5.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 14.32% | +4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 14.32% | +4.60% |
ALIL vs. ABIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALIL has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ABIG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
ALIL vs. ABIG - Dividend Comparison
ALIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, more than ABIG's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ABIG Argent Large Cap ETF | 0.09% | 0.10% |
ALIL Argent Focused Small Cap ETF | 0.44% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ALIL and ABIG have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALIL has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to ABIG (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALIL dropped -12.60% vs ABIG's -13.70%.
On 1-year performance, ABIG leads with 18.30% vs 12.05% for ALIL. On fees, ABIG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, ABIG has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ABIG has performed better with a 18.30% return vs 12.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ABIG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for ALIL.
ALIL has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.09% for ABIG.
ALIL is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while ABIG is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for ALIL and 0.49% for ABIG.
ABIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALIL and ABIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer