ALIL vs. ASCE

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ALIL (Argent Focused Small Cap ETF) and ASCE (Allspring SMID Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ALIL returned 8.10% vs 36.63% for ASCE. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ALIL charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ASCE.

Performance

ALIL vs. ASCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Argent Focused Small Cap ETF (ALIL) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALIL achieves a 7.45% return, which is significantly lower than ASCE's 25.79% return.

ALIL

• 1D: -1.41%
• 1M: -2.92%
• 6M: 2.07%
• YTD: 7.45%
• 1Y: 8.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASCE

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: -2.51%
• 6M: 19.63%
• YTD: 25.79%
• 1Y: 36.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALIL vs. ASCE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ALIL Argent Focused Small Cap ETF	7.45%	1.61%
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	25.79%	8.46%

Correlation

The correlation between ALIL and ASCE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	0.86

The correlation between ALIL and ASCE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ALIL vs. ASCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALIL

ALIL Risk / Return Rank: 18
ALIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
ALIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
ALIL Omega Ratio Rank: 15
ALIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
ALIL Martin Ratio Rank: 20

ASCE

ASCE Risk / Return Rank: 77
ASCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
ASCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
ASCE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
ASCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ASCE Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALIL vs. ASCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Argent Focused Small Cap ETF (ALIL) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ALIL	ASCE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	1.87	-1.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	2.71	-1.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.31	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.65	3.99	-3.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.84	12.48	-10.63

ALIL vs. ASCE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALIL Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the ASCE Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALIL and ASCE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ALIL vs. ASCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALIL drawdown since its inception was -12.60%, which is greater than ASCE's maximum drawdown of -9.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALIL and ASCE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALIL	ASCE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.60%	-9.22%	-3.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.60%	-9.22%	-3.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.70%	-4.17%	-2.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.09%	-2.03%	-1.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.41%	2.94%	+1.47%

Volatility

ALIL vs. ASCE - Volatility Comparison

Argent Focused Small Cap ETF (ALIL) has a higher volatility of 7.89% compared to Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) at 7.16%. This indicates that ALIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALIL	ASCE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.89%	7.16%	+0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.13%	14.91%	+0.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.75%	19.75%	0.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.12%	19.65%	+1.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.12%	19.65%	+1.47%

ALIL vs. ASCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALIL has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ASCE's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

ALIL vs. ASCE - Dividend Comparison

ALIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, more than ASCE's 0.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ALIL Argent Focused Small Cap ETF	0.44%	0.47%
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	0.17%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALIL and ASCE in my portfolio?

ALIL and ASCE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ALIL or ASCE?

ALIL has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to ASCE (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALIL dropped -12.60% vs ASCE's -9.22%.

Which ETF is better, ALIL or ASCE?

On 1-year performance, ASCE leads with 36.63% vs 8.10% for ALIL. On fees, ASCE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, ASCE has been the lower-risk option at 7.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ALIL or ASCE?

Over the 1-year period, ASCE has performed better with a 36.63% return vs 8.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ALIL or ASCE?

ASCE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for ALIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ALIL or ASCE?

ALIL has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.17% for ASCE.

What is the main difference between ALIL and ASCE?

They also come from different issuers: Argent and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for ALIL and 0.38% for ASCE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.