AJG vs. FANG
AJG (Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.) and FANG (Diamondback Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. AJG operates in Insurance Brokers (Financial Services), while FANG operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, AJG returned 19.74%/yr vs 11.22%/yr for FANG. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AJG vs. FANG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AJG achieves a -1.36% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's 31.46% return. Over the past 10 years, AJG has outperformed FANG with an annualized return of 19.74%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively lower 11.22% annualized return.
AJG
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 18.50%
- 6M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- -1.36%
- 1Y
- -18.08%
- 3Y*
- 6.09%
- 5Y*
- 13.67%
- 10Y*
- 19.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.61%
FANG
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 6.47%
- 6M
- 30.64%
- YTD
- 31.46%
- 1Y
- 41.77%
- 3Y*
- 15.59%
- 5Y*
- 24.94%
- 10Y*
- 11.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 21.34%
AJG vs. FANG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | -1.36% | -8.03% | 27.34% | 20.51% | 12.44% | 39.02% | 32.12% | 31.79% | 19.19% | 25.04% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 31.46% | -5.64% | 10.35% | 19.66% | 35.34% | 127.51% | -46.00% | 0.92% | -26.35% | 24.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between AJG and FANG is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2012 | 0.21 |
The correlation between AJG and FANG shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AJG:
$65.18B
FANG:
$54.96B
AJG:
$5.74
FANG:
$1.41
AJG:
44.21
FANG:
138.71
AJG:
4.74
FANG:
3.68
AJG:
$13.94B
FANG:
$15.19B
AJG:
$7.63B
FANG:
$7.30B
AJG:
$3.66B
FANG:
$5.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AJG vs. FANG — Risk / Return Rank
AJG
FANG
AJG vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AJG | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.23 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 2.20 | -2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.79 | 6.27 | -7.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AJG vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AJG drawdown since its inception was -57.49%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AJG and FANG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AJG | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.49% | -88.72% | +31.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.59% | -19.09% | -19.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.40% | -42.10% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.40% | -42.10% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.40% | -88.72% | +44.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.31% | -8.07% | -18.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.87% | -19.33% | +6.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.05% | 6.68% | +16.37% |
Volatility
AJG vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) has a higher volatility of 10.92% compared to Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) at 9.53%. This indicates that AJG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AJG | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.92% | 9.53% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.11% | 23.42% | +0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.72% | 31.08% | -1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.42% | 37.38% | -13.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.24% | 49.05% | -25.81% |
Dividends
AJG vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison
AJG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than FANG's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | 1.06% | 1.00% | 0.85% | 0.98% | 1.08% | 1.13% | 1.46% | 1.81% | 2.23% | 2.47% | 2.93% | 3.62% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 2.12% | 2.66% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AJG vs. FANG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AJG vs. FANG - Profitability Comparison
AJG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 3.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.1%.
FANG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.85B and revenue of 4.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.9%.
AJG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported an operating income of 341.00M and revenue of 3.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.
FANG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 30.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.
AJG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a net income of 151.00M and revenue of 3.63B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.
FANG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 144.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AJG and FANG have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AJG has higher volatility (10.92%) compared to FANG (9.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AJG dropped -57.49% vs FANG's -88.72%.
FANG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AJG and FANG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer