PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIVL vs. IMCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIVL vs. IMCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIVL achieves a 14.65% return, which is significantly higher than IMCV's 12.06% return. Over the past 10 years, AIVL has underperformed IMCV with an annualized return of 9.00%, while IMCV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.28% annualized return.


AIVL

1D
1.99%
1M
3.43%
YTD
14.65%
6M
13.61%
1Y
19.53%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
9.00%

IMCV

1D
0.44%
1M
2.32%
YTD
12.06%
6M
10.91%
1Y
24.85%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
9.62%
10Y*
11.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIVL vs. IMCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIVL
WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund
14.65%9.72%13.49%7.17%-7.26%24.30%-5.82%24.40%-9.57%13.77%
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
12.06%13.52%12.28%11.89%-6.98%33.56%-4.11%24.72%-10.93%12.60%

Correlation

The correlation between AIVL and IMCV is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2006

0.90

The correlation between AIVL and IMCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIVL vs. IMCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIVL
IMCV

Technology

21.3%
10.3%

Financial Services

17.9%
15.2%

Industrials

15.5%
11.8%

Healthcare

12.0%
8.7%

Utilities

8.9%
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.8%
9.0%

Basic Materials

4.6%
6.4%

Communication Services

4.2%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

3.1%
9.1%

Energy

3.1%
11.9%

Real Estate

1.5%
5.5%

Technology

AIVL
21.3%
IMCV
10.3%

Financial Services

AIVL
17.9%
IMCV
15.2%

Industrials

AIVL
15.5%
IMCV
11.8%

Healthcare

AIVL
12.0%
IMCV
8.7%

Utilities

AIVL
8.9%
IMCV
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

AIVL
7.8%
IMCV
9.0%

Basic Materials

AIVL
4.6%
IMCV
6.4%

Communication Services

AIVL
4.2%
IMCV
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

AIVL
3.1%
IMCV
9.1%

Energy

AIVL
3.1%
IMCV
11.9%

Real Estate

AIVL
1.5%
IMCV
5.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIVL vs. IMCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIVL
AIVL Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
AIVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

IMCV
IMCV Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
IMCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCV Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIVL vs. IMCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIVLIMCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.38

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

3.62

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.06

13.43

-3.37

AIVL vs. IMCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIVL Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the IMCV Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIVL and IMCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIVL vs. IMCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVL drawdown since its inception was -62.48%, roughly equal to the maximum IMCV drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVL and IMCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIVLIMCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.48%

-64.74%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

-6.90%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.48%

-18.63%

+4.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.08%

-19.87%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.16%

-46.33%

+5.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.89%

-8.39%

+0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

1.85%

+0.10%

Volatility

AIVL vs. IMCV - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) at 3.03%. This indicates that AIVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIVLIMCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

3.03%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.36%

8.11%

+1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.76%

11.74%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.76%

16.62%

-1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

19.61%

-2.25%

AIVL vs. IMCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIVL has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCV's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIVL vs. IMCV - Dividend Comparison

AIVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than IMCV's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVL
WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund
1.47%1.61%2.13%2.43%2.08%2.75%3.55%3.25%4.18%3.16%3.20%3.41%
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
1.89%2.23%2.36%2.30%2.36%1.86%2.61%2.45%2.61%1.87%2.09%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIVL and IMCV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIVL has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to IMCV (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIVL dropped -62.48% vs IMCV's -64.74%.

On 10-year performance, IMCV leads with 11.28% vs 9.00% for AIVL. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IMCV has performed better with a 11.28% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for AIVL.

IMCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 1.47% for AIVL.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for AIVL and 0.06% for IMCV.

IMCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIVL and IMCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer