PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIVL vs. IMCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIVL vs. IMCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AIVL having a 10.60% return and IMCV slightly higher at 10.94%. Over the past 10 years, AIVL has underperformed IMCV with an annualized return of 8.24%, while IMCV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.40% annualized return.


AIVL

1D
0.01%
1M
2.83%
YTD
10.60%
6M
11.55%
1Y
16.62%
3Y*
14.47%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
8.24%

IMCV

1D
0.89%
1M
2.32%
YTD
10.94%
6M
12.09%
1Y
25.32%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
10.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIVL vs. IMCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIVL
WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund
10.60%9.72%13.49%7.17%-7.26%24.30%-5.82%24.40%-9.57%13.77%
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
10.94%13.52%12.28%11.89%-6.98%33.56%-4.11%24.72%-10.93%12.60%

Correlation

The correlation between AIVL and IMCV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2006

0.90

The correlation between AIVL and IMCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIVL vs. IMCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIVL
IMCV

Financial Services

18.2%
15.6%

Technology

17.9%
9.1%

Industrials

15.8%
12.1%

Healthcare

13.2%
8.5%

Utilities

9.3%
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.9%
8.9%

Basic Materials

5.7%
6.5%

Communication Services

4.3%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
8.7%

Energy

2.4%
12.5%

Real Estate

0.9%
5.6%

Financial Services

AIVL
18.2%
IMCV
15.6%

Technology

AIVL
17.9%
IMCV
9.1%

Industrials

AIVL
15.8%
IMCV
12.1%

Healthcare

AIVL
13.2%
IMCV
8.5%

Utilities

AIVL
9.3%
IMCV
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

AIVL
8.9%
IMCV
8.9%

Basic Materials

AIVL
5.7%
IMCV
6.5%

Communication Services

AIVL
4.3%
IMCV
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

AIVL
3.5%
IMCV
8.7%

Energy

AIVL
2.4%
IMCV
12.5%

Real Estate

AIVL
0.9%
IMCV
5.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIVL vs. IMCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIVL
AIVL Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
AIVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVL Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVL Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

IMCV
IMCV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IMCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCV Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIVL vs. IMCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIVLIMCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

3.68

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.60

13.75

-5.15

AIVL vs. IMCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIVL Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the IMCV Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIVL and IMCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIVLIMCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

2.19

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.54

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.53

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.48

-0.05

Drawdowns

AIVL vs. IMCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVL drawdown since its inception was -62.48%, roughly equal to the maximum IMCV drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVL and IMCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIVLIMCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.48%

-64.74%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

-6.90%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.48%

-18.63%

+4.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.08%

-19.87%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.16%

-46.33%

+5.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

0.00%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.91%

-8.41%

+0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

1.85%

+0.09%

Volatility

AIVL vs. IMCV - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) has a higher volatility of 2.98% compared to iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) at 2.62%. This indicates that AIVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIVLIMCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

2.62%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.62%

8.03%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.19%

11.65%

-0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.72%

16.64%

-1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.34%

19.66%

-2.32%

AIVL vs. IMCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIVL has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCV's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIVL vs. IMCV - Dividend Comparison

AIVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than IMCV's 1.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVL
WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund
1.45%1.61%2.13%2.43%2.08%2.75%3.55%3.25%4.18%3.16%3.20%3.41%
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
1.92%2.23%2.36%2.30%2.36%1.86%2.61%2.45%2.61%1.87%2.09%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIVL and IMCV have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIVL has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to IMCV (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIVL dropped -62.48% vs IMCV's -64.74%.

On 10-year performance, IMCV leads with 10.40% vs 8.24% for AIVL. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IMCV has performed better with a 10.40% return vs 8.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for AIVL.

IMCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 1.45% for AIVL.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for AIVL and 0.06% for IMCV.

IMCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIVL and IMCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer