PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIVL vs. CGDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIVL vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIVL achieves a 16.26% return, which is significantly higher than CGDV's 14.16% return.


AIVL

1D
0.41%
1M
0.73%
6M
11.74%
YTD
16.26%
1Y
21.46%
3Y*
13.45%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
8.44%
ALL TIME*
8.37%

CGDV

1D
0.63%
1M
1.21%
6M
11.03%
YTD
14.16%
1Y
25.16%
3Y*
22.55%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$552.10K$822.97K$521.55K
$192.53M$192.47M$184.78M

AIVL vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AIVL
WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund
16.26%9.72%13.49%7.17%-2.20%
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
14.16%25.50%20.10%28.81%-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between AIVL and CGDV is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022

0.84

The correlation between AIVL and CGDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AIVL vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIVL
CGDV

Technology

22.4%
34.5%

Financial Services

17.3%
6.7%

Industrials

15.2%
13.6%

Healthcare

11.9%
8.2%

Utilities

8.9%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.8%
5.8%

Basic Materials

4.8%
2.8%

Communication Services

3.8%
9.8%

Energy

3.2%
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

3.1%
12.6%

Real Estate

1.4%
1.0%

Technology

AIVL
22.4%
CGDV
34.5%

Financial Services

AIVL
17.3%
CGDV
6.7%

Industrials

AIVL
15.2%
CGDV
13.6%

Healthcare

AIVL
11.9%
CGDV
8.2%

Utilities

AIVL
8.9%
CGDV
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

AIVL
7.8%
CGDV
5.8%

Basic Materials

AIVL
4.8%
CGDV
2.8%

Communication Services

AIVL
3.8%
CGDV
9.8%

Energy

AIVL
3.2%
CGDV
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

AIVL
3.1%
CGDV
12.6%

Real Estate

AIVL
1.4%
CGDV
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIVL vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIVL
AIVL Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
AIVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVL Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVL Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

CGDV
CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIVL vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIVLCGDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.35

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

2.44

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.46

11.39

-0.93

AIVL vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIVL Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIVL and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIVL vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVL drawdown since its inception was -62.48%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVL and CGDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIVLCGDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.48%

-21.82%

-40.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

-9.75%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.48%

-14.28%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

0.00%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-3.52%

-4.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.09%

-0.19%

Volatility

AIVL vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) have volatilities of 3.29% and 3.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIVLCGDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

3.28%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.40%

10.06%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

12.55%

-0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

15.48%

-0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.33%

15.48%

+1.85%

AIVL vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIVL has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIVL vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

AIVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than CGDV's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVL
WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund
1.45%1.61%2.13%2.43%2.08%2.75%3.55%3.25%4.18%3.16%3.20%3.41%
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
1.18%1.29%1.60%1.65%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIVL and CGDV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIVL has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to CGDV (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIVL dropped -62.48% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 22.55% vs 13.45% for AIVL. On fees, CGDV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 22.55% return vs 13.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGDV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for AIVL.

AIVL has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.18% for CGDV.

AIVL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while CGDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for AIVL and 0.33% for CGDV.

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIVL and CGDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer