AIFD vs. GXPT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AIFD (TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF) and GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. AIFD is actively managed, while GXPT is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AIFD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPT.

Performance

AIFD vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIFD achieves a 39.56% return, which is significantly higher than GXPT's 16.86% return.

AIFD

• 1D: -4.95%
• 1M: 2.31%
• YTD: 39.56%
• 6M: 37.82%
• 1Y: 79.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GXPT

• 1D: -3.44%
• 1M: -0.96%
• YTD: 16.86%
• 6M: 15.57%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIFD vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF	39.56%	21.13%
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF	16.86%	11.47%

Correlation

The correlation between AIFD and GXPT is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025	0.87

Return for Risk

AIFD vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIFD

AIFD Risk / Return Rank: 88
AIFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
AIFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
AIFD Omega Ratio Rank: 82
AIFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
AIFD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

GXPT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIFD vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIFD	GXPT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.88	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.80	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.05	—	—

Drawdowns

AIFD vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIFD drawdown since its inception was -33.20%, which is greater than GXPT's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIFD and GXPT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIFD	GXPT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.20%	-18.74%	-14.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.46%	-8.72%	+0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.73%	-5.04%	-0.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.19%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AIFD	GXPT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.42%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.17%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.76%	22.91%	+4.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.99%	22.91%	+7.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.99%	22.91%	+7.08%

AIFD vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIFD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIFD vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison

AIFD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.

Position	TTM	2025
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.00%	0.00%
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF	0.12%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIFD and GXPT in my portfolio?

AIFD and GXPT have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AIFD or GXPT?

On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIFD or GXPT?

GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIFD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIFD or GXPT?

GXPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for AIFD.

What is the main difference between AIFD and GXPT?

They also come from different issuers: TCW and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIFD and 0.15% for GXPT.