AIFD vs. THNQ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

AIFD (TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF) and THNQ (ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. AIFD is actively managed, while THNQ is passively managed. Over the past year, AIFD returned 90.92% vs 73.03% for THNQ. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AIFD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for THNQ.

Performance

AIFD vs. THNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIFD achieves a 46.82% return, which is significantly higher than THNQ's 40.67% return.

AIFD

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 7.64%
• YTD: 46.82%
• 6M: 45.76%
• 1Y: 90.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

THNQ

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 5.42%
• YTD: 40.67%
• 6M: 37.21%
• 1Y: 73.03%
• 3Y*: 36.60%
• 5Y*: 16.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIFD vs. THNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF	46.82%	28.30%	15.22%
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	40.67%	29.83%	14.33%

Correlation

The correlation between AIFD and THNQ is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2024	0.88

The correlation between AIFD and THNQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIFD vs. THNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIFD	THNQ
Technology	73.2%	74.2%
Communication Services	11.0%	10.5%
Industrials	9.8%	0.8%
Consumer Cyclical	6.0%	7.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	1.4%
Healthcare	-	5.2%
Real Estate	-	0.7%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AIFD vs. THNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIFD

AIFD Risk / Return Rank: 92
AIFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
AIFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
AIFD Omega Ratio Rank: 87
AIFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
AIFD Martin Ratio Rank: 95

THNQ

THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 76
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 71
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIFD vs. THNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIFD	THNQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.35	2.60	+0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.76	3.11	+0.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.40	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.78	3.99	+3.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	29.05	12.65	+16.40

AIFD vs. THNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIFD Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is comparable to the THNQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIFD and THNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AIFD vs. THNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIFD drawdown since its inception was -33.20%, smaller than the maximum THNQ drawdown of -50.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIFD and THNQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIFD	THNQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.20%	-50.56%	+17.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.75%	-18.39%	+6.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.88%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.70%	-4.50%	+0.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.73%	-15.00%	+9.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.14%	5.79%	-2.65%

Volatility

AIFD vs. THNQ - Volatility Comparison

TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) have volatilities of 12.42% and 12.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIFD	THNQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.42%	12.90%	-0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.57%	22.87%	-1.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.32%	28.34%	-1.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.81%	29.44%	+0.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.81%	28.86%	+0.95%

AIFD vs. THNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIFD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than THNQ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIFD vs. THNQ - Dividend Comparison

AIFD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while THNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%.

Position	TTM	2025
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.00%	0.00%
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.15%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIFD and THNQ in my portfolio?

AIFD and THNQ have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AIFD or THNQ?

THNQ has higher volatility (12.90%) compared to AIFD (12.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIFD dropped -33.20% vs THNQ's -50.56%.

Which ETF is better, AIFD or THNQ?

On 1-year performance, AIFD leads with 90.92% vs 73.03% for THNQ. On fees, THNQ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, AIFD has been the lower-risk option at 12.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AIFD or THNQ?

Over the 1-year period, AIFD has performed better with a 90.92% return vs 73.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIFD or THNQ?

THNQ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIFD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIFD or THNQ?

THNQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.00% for AIFD.

What is the main difference between AIFD and THNQ?

They also come from different issuers: TCW and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIFD and 0.68% for THNQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.