AIFD vs. GRW

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

AIFD (TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIFD is a Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by TCW, while GRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TCW. Both are actively managed. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

AIFD vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AIFD

• 1D: 1.48%
• 1M: -5.02%
• 6M: 27.69%
• YTD: 30.44%
• 1Y: 55.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 34.17%

GRW

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: -1.32%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF	$710.64K	$728.72K	$1.19M
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	$173.33K	$124.39K	$212.92K

AIFD vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF	-5.25%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	2.98%

Correlation

The correlation between AIFD and GRW is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.61

AIFD vs. GRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIFD	GRW
Technology	73.7%	26.9%
Industrials	10.0%	41.5%
Communication Services	7.0%	7.9%
Consumer Cyclical	5.2%	7.5%
Basic Materials	-	3.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	8.8%
Healthcare	-	3.7%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AIFD vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIFD

AIFD Risk / Return Rank: 73
AIFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
AIFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
AIFD Omega Ratio Rank: 67
AIFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
AIFD Martin Ratio Rank: 81

GRW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIFD vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIFD	GRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.64	—	—

Drawdowns

AIFD vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIFD drawdown since its inception was -33.20%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -4.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIFD and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIFD	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.20%	-4.12%	-29.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.44%	-1.85%	-12.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.98%	-1.73%	-4.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.93%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AIFD	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.69%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.06%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.35%	15.72%	+14.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.57%	15.72%	+14.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.57%	15.72%	+14.85%

AIFD vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AIFD and GRW have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

AIFD vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIFD nor GRW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIFD and GRW in my portfolio?

AIFD and GRW have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AIFD or GRW?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIFD or GRW?

AIFD and GRW have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIFD or GRW?

AIFD and GRW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AIFD and GRW?

AIFD is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while GRW is Large Cap Growth Equities.