AFTY vs. CNXT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT).

AFTY and CNXT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AFTY is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the FTSE China A 50. It was launched on Mar 12, 2015. CNXT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the SME-ChiNext 100 Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2014. Both AFTY and CNXT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

AFTY vs. CNXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AFTY vs. CNXT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	20.48%	-12.80%	-22.47%	-7.37%	33.77%	44.23%	-24.26%	45.15%
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF	3.84%	59.31%	12.42%	-21.47%	-35.58%	8.78%	63.30%	42.66%	-39.48%	20.19%

Returns By Period

AFTY

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNXT

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -1.88%
• YTD: 3.84%
• 6M: 3.16%
• 1Y: 65.45%
• 3Y*: 12.47%
• 5Y*: 1.59%
• 10Y*: 3.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFTY vs. CNXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFTY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CNXT's 0.65% expense ratio.

AFTY

Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF

CNXT

VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF

Return for Risk

AFTY vs. CNXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNXT

CNXT Risk / Return Rank: 92
CNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
CNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFTY vs. CNXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AFTY	CNXT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.17	—

Correlation

The correlation between AFTY and CNXT is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AFTY vs. CNXT - Dividend Comparison

AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.23%	2.08%	1.84%	1.48%	7.96%	1.85%	6.62%	1.19%	16.76%
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF	0.17%	0.18%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	9.22%	0.01%	0.45%	0.00%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	AFTY	CNXT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-68.98%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.21%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-23.90%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-43.42%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.80%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AFTY	CNXT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.08%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	31.89%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	34.93%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	31.54%	—