AFTY vs. CNXT
AFTY (Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF) and CNXT (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF) are both China Equities funds - AFTY tracks the FTSE China A 50 while CNXT tracks the SME-ChiNext 100 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AFTY charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CNXT.
Performance
AFTY vs. CNXT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AFTY
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNXT
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 10.51%
- YTD
- 33.52%
- 6M
- 41.38%
- 1Y
- 119.62%
- 3Y*
- 26.28%
- 5Y*
- 4.09%
- 10Y*
- 6.63%
AFTY vs. CNXT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.48% | -12.80% | -22.47% | -7.37% | 33.77% | 44.23% | -24.26% | 45.15% |
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 33.52% | 59.31% | 12.42% | -21.47% | -35.58% | 8.78% | 63.30% | 42.66% | -39.48% | 20.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFTY and CNXT is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2015 | 0.64 |
The correlation between AFTY and CNXT shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AFTY vs. CNXT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AFTY
CNXT
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
AFTY
CNXT
Basic Materials
AFTY
CNXT
Energy
AFTY
CNXT
-
Technology
AFTY
CNXT
Consumer Defensive
AFTY
CNXT
Industrials
AFTY
CNXT
Utilities
AFTY
CNXT
-
Communication Services
AFTY
-
CNXT
Consumer Cyclical
AFTY
-
CNXT
Healthcare
AFTY
-
CNXT
Real Estate
AFTY
-
CNXT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFTY vs. CNXT — Risk / Return Rank
AFTY
CNXT
AFTY vs. CNXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFTY | CNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.22 | — |
Drawdowns
AFTY vs. CNXT - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFTY | CNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -68.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -48.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -2.15% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -42.94% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.98% | — |
Volatility
AFTY vs. CNXT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFTY | CNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 30.74% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 35.27% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 31.64% | — |
AFTY vs. CNXT - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFTY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CNXT's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFTY vs. CNXT - Dividend Comparison
AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.23% | 2.08% | 1.84% | 1.48% | 7.96% | 1.85% | 6.62% | 1.19% | 16.76% |
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 0.13% | 0.18% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.22% | 0.01% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFTY and CNXT have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CNXT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CNXT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AFTY.
CNXT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for AFTY.
AFTY tracks FTSE China A 50, while CNXT tracks SME-ChiNext 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for AFTY and 0.65% for CNXT.
Find the right allocation for AFTY and CNXT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer