PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFTY vs. CNXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFTY vs. CNXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AFTY

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CNXT

1D
0.88%
1M
10.51%
YTD
33.52%
6M
41.38%
1Y
119.62%
3Y*
26.28%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*
6.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFTY vs. CNXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFTY
Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF
0.00%0.00%20.48%-12.80%-22.47%-7.37%33.77%44.23%-24.26%45.15%
CNXT
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF
33.52%59.31%12.42%-21.47%-35.58%8.78%63.30%42.66%-39.48%20.19%

Correlation

The correlation between AFTY and CNXT is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2015

0.64

The correlation between AFTY and CNXT shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AFTY vs. CNXT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AFTY
CNXT

Financial Services

50.4%
5.6%

Basic Materials

15.5%
4.1%

Energy

11.5%

-

Technology

7.4%
43.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
2.6%

Industrials

4.7%
33.2%

Utilities

4.4%

-

Communication Services

-

2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.2%

Healthcare

-

7.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

AFTY
50.4%
CNXT
5.6%

Basic Materials

AFTY
15.5%
CNXT
4.1%

Energy

AFTY
11.5%
CNXT

-

Technology

AFTY
7.4%
CNXT
43.8%

Consumer Defensive

AFTY
6.1%
CNXT
2.6%

Industrials

AFTY
4.7%
CNXT
33.2%

Utilities

AFTY
4.4%
CNXT

-

Communication Services

AFTY

-

CNXT
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

AFTY

-

CNXT
1.2%

Healthcare

AFTY

-

CNXT
7.0%

Real Estate

AFTY

-

CNXT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFTY vs. CNXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFTY

CNXT
CNXT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFTY vs. CNXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AFTY vs. CNXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFTYCNXTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

Drawdowns

AFTY vs. CNXT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFTYCNXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

Volatility

AFTY vs. CNXT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFTYCNXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.64%

AFTY vs. CNXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFTY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CNXT's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFTY vs. CNXT - Dividend Comparison

AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFTY
Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.23%2.08%1.84%1.48%7.96%1.85%6.62%1.19%16.76%
CNXT
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF
0.13%0.18%0.15%0.00%0.00%9.22%0.01%0.45%0.00%0.19%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFTY and CNXT have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CNXT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CNXT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AFTY.

CNXT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for AFTY.

AFTY tracks FTSE China A 50, while CNXT tracks SME-ChiNext 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for AFTY and 0.65% for CNXT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFTY and CNXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer