PortfoliosLab logo
AFTY vs. AAXJ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AFTY and AAXJ is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

AFTY vs. AAXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


AFTY

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

AAXJ

YTD

9.19%

1M

11.61%

6M

7.58%

1Y

9.26%

3Y*

6.36%

5Y*

5.63%

10Y*

3.38%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF

AFTY vs. AAXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFTY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than AAXJ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AFTY vs. AAXJ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFTY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AFTY is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AFTY is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AFTY is 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AFTY is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AFTY is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AFTY is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

AAXJ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AAXJ is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AAXJ is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AAXJ is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AAXJ is 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AAXJ is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AAXJ is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AFTY vs. AAXJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

AFTY vs. AAXJ - Dividend Comparison

AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AFTY
Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF
100.00%100.00%2.23%0.00%1.84%1.48%8.63%1.85%6.62%1.19%16.76%0.00%
AAXJ
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF
1.70%1.86%2.26%1.73%2.21%1.06%1.83%2.10%1.99%1.77%2.44%1.78%

Drawdowns

AFTY vs. AAXJ - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Volatility

AFTY vs. AAXJ - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...