PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFTY vs. ASHR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFTY vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AFTY

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ASHR

1D
2.09%
1M
2.32%
YTD
10.26%
6M
13.75%
1Y
40.21%
3Y*
12.12%
5Y*
-0.98%
10Y*
5.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFTY vs. ASHR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFTY
Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF
0.00%0.00%20.48%-12.80%-22.47%-7.37%33.77%44.23%-24.26%45.15%
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund
10.26%27.02%11.95%-12.52%-27.52%-1.57%36.29%36.50%-28.45%33.47%

Correlation

The correlation between AFTY and ASHR is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2015

0.84

The correlation between AFTY and ASHR shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AFTY vs. ASHR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AFTY
ASHR

Financial Services

50.4%
20.4%

Basic Materials

15.5%
10.7%

Energy

11.5%
2.7%

Technology

7.4%
26.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
7.3%

Industrials

4.7%
16.7%

Utilities

4.4%
3.0%

Communication Services

-

0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.7%

Healthcare

-

4.9%

Real Estate

-

0.5%

Financial Services

AFTY
50.4%
ASHR
20.4%

Basic Materials

AFTY
15.5%
ASHR
10.7%

Energy

AFTY
11.5%
ASHR
2.7%

Technology

AFTY
7.4%
ASHR
26.3%

Consumer Defensive

AFTY
6.1%
ASHR
7.3%

Industrials

AFTY
4.7%
ASHR
16.7%

Utilities

AFTY
4.4%
ASHR
3.0%

Communication Services

AFTY

-

ASHR
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

AFTY

-

ASHR
6.7%

Healthcare

AFTY

-

ASHR
4.9%

Real Estate

AFTY

-

ASHR
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFTY vs. ASHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFTY

ASHR
ASHR Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ASHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASHR Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ASHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASHR Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFTY vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AFTY vs. ASHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFTYASHRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

Drawdowns

AFTY vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFTYASHRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

Volatility

AFTY vs. ASHR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFTYASHRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.06%

AFTY vs. ASHR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFTY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ASHR's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFTY vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison

AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFTY
Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.23%2.08%1.84%1.48%7.96%1.85%6.62%1.19%16.76%
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund
2.09%2.31%1.13%2.48%1.13%0.88%0.81%0.98%1.32%0.84%0.73%30.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFTY and ASHR have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASHR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASHR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AFTY.

ASHR has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 0.00% for AFTY.

AFTY tracks FTSE China A 50, while ASHR tracks CSI 300 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for AFTY and 0.65% for ASHR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFTY and ASHR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer