AFTY vs. ASHR
AFTY (Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF) and ASHR (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund) are both China Equities funds - AFTY tracks the FTSE China A 50 while ASHR tracks the CSI 300 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AFTY charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASHR.
Performance
AFTY vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AFTY
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASHR
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 6M
- 13.75%
- 1Y
- 40.21%
- 3Y*
- 12.12%
- 5Y*
- -0.98%
- 10Y*
- 5.39%
AFTY vs. ASHR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.48% | -12.80% | -22.47% | -7.37% | 33.77% | 44.23% | -24.26% | 45.15% |
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund | 10.26% | 27.02% | 11.95% | -12.52% | -27.52% | -1.57% | 36.29% | 36.50% | -28.45% | 33.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFTY and ASHR is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2015 | 0.84 |
The correlation between AFTY and ASHR shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AFTY vs. ASHR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AFTY
ASHR
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
AFTY
ASHR
Basic Materials
AFTY
ASHR
Energy
AFTY
ASHR
Technology
AFTY
ASHR
Consumer Defensive
AFTY
ASHR
Industrials
AFTY
ASHR
Utilities
AFTY
ASHR
Communication Services
AFTY
-
ASHR
Consumer Cyclical
AFTY
-
ASHR
Healthcare
AFTY
-
ASHR
Real Estate
AFTY
-
ASHR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFTY vs. ASHR — Risk / Return Rank
AFTY
ASHR
AFTY vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFTY | ASHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.23 | — |
Drawdowns
AFTY vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFTY | ASHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -51.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -33.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -15.52% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -29.19% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.48% | — |
Volatility
AFTY vs. ASHR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFTY | ASHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.94% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 16.84% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 23.90% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 24.06% | — |
AFTY vs. ASHR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFTY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ASHR's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFTY vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison
AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.23% | 2.08% | 1.84% | 1.48% | 7.96% | 1.85% | 6.62% | 1.19% | 16.76% |
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund | 2.09% | 2.31% | 1.13% | 2.48% | 1.13% | 0.88% | 0.81% | 0.98% | 1.32% | 0.84% | 0.73% | 30.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFTY and ASHR have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASHR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASHR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AFTY.
ASHR has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 0.00% for AFTY.
AFTY tracks FTSE China A 50, while ASHR tracks CSI 300 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for AFTY and 0.65% for ASHR.
Find the right allocation for AFTY and ASHR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer