PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFRU vs. NVDQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFRU vs. NVDQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFRU achieves a -38.11% return, which is significantly lower than NVDQ's -36.13% return.


AFRU

1D
-13.32%
1M
-6.56%
YTD
-38.11%
6M
-32.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDQ

1D
7.09%
1M
-18.40%
YTD
-36.13%
6M
-41.91%
1Y
-68.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFRU vs. NVDQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AFRU
T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF
-38.11%-42.30%
NVDQ
T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
-36.13%-21.28%

Correlation

The correlation between AFRU and NVDQ is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025

-0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFRU vs. NVDQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFRU

NVDQ
NVDQ Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NVDQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDQ Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDQ Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFRU vs. NVDQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AFRU vs. NVDQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFRUNVDQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.63

-0.89

+0.26

Drawdowns

AFRU vs. NVDQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFRU drawdown since its inception was -84.44%, smaller than the maximum NVDQ drawdown of -99.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFRU and NVDQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFRUNVDQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.44%

-99.45%

+15.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.60%

-99.35%

+33.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.01%

-88.21%

+32.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.57%

Volatility

AFRU vs. NVDQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFRUNVDQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

121.30%

67.86%

+53.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

121.30%

95.52%

+25.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

121.30%

95.52%

+25.78%

AFRU vs. NVDQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFRU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDQ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFRU vs. NVDQ - Dividend Comparison

AFRU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.


PositionTTM202520242023
AFRU
T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDQ
T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
0.41%0.26%4.59%11.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFRU and NVDQ have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NVDQ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NVDQ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for AFRU.

NVDQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.00% for AFRU.

AFRU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVDQ is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for AFRU and 1.05% for NVDQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFRU and NVDQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer