AFRU vs. NVDQ
AFRU (T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF) and NVDQ (T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AFRU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while NVDQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. AFRU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NVDQ.
Performance
AFRU vs. NVDQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFRU achieves a -18.41% return, which is significantly higher than NVDQ's -28.10% return.
AFRU
- 1D
- 15.68%
- 1M
- 34.14%
- YTD
- -18.41%
- 6M
- -22.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDQ
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 11.23%
- YTD
- -28.10%
- 6M
- -26.43%
- 1Y
- -61.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFRU vs. NVDQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AFRU T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF | -18.41% | -38.81% |
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | -28.10% | -18.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFRU and NVDQ is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | -0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFRU vs. NVDQ — Risk / Return Rank
AFRU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NVDQ
AFRU vs. NVDQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFRU | NVDQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.85 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.90 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.48 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFRU vs. NVDQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFRU drawdown since its inception was -84.44%, smaller than the maximum NVDQ drawdown of -99.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFRU and NVDQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFRU | NVDQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.44% | -99.45% | +15.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -68.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.65% | -99.27% | +44.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.22% | -88.31% | +32.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 45.99% | — |
Volatility
AFRU vs. NVDQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFRU | NVDQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 26.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 53.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 124.30% | 70.45% | +53.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 124.30% | 95.37% | +28.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 124.30% | 95.37% | +28.93% |
AFRU vs. NVDQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFRU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDQ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFRU vs. NVDQ - Dividend Comparison
AFRU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AFRU T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | 0.36% | 0.26% | 4.59% | 11.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFRU and NVDQ have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDQ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDQ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for AFRU.
NVDQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for AFRU.
AFRU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVDQ is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for AFRU and 1.05% for NVDQ.
Find the right allocation for AFRU and NVDQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer