PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFRU vs. CRCD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFRU vs. CRCD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU) and T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFRU achieves a -5.67% return, which is significantly higher than CRCD's -80.88% return.


AFRU

1D
5.14%
1M
56.19%
6M
-8.20%
YTD
-5.67%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRCD

1D
-0.30%
1M
25.38%
6M
-78.18%
YTD
-80.88%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFRU vs. CRCD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AFRU and CRCD is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025

-0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFRU vs. CRCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU) and T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AFRU vs. CRCD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AFRU vs. CRCD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFRU drawdown since its inception was -84.44%, smaller than the maximum CRCD drawdown of -96.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFRU and CRCD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFRUCRCDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.44%

-96.95%

+12.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.57%

-90.93%

+43.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.78%

-59.69%

+3.91%

Volatility

AFRU vs. CRCD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFRUCRCDDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

121.73%

200.82%

-79.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

121.73%

200.82%

-79.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

121.73%

200.82%

-79.09%

AFRU vs. CRCD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AFRU and CRCD have an expense ratio of 1.50%.


Dividends

AFRU vs. CRCD - Dividend Comparison

Neither AFRU nor CRCD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AFRU and CRCD have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AFRU and CRCD have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

AFRU and CRCD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

AFRU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CRCD is Inverse Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFRU and CRCD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer