PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFRU vs. TTDU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFRU vs. TTDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU) and T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFRU achieves a -38.11% return, which is significantly higher than TTDU's -77.55% return.


AFRU

1D
-13.32%
1M
-6.56%
YTD
-38.11%
6M
-32.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TTDU

1D
-5.44%
1M
-31.38%
YTD
-77.55%
6M
-78.75%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFRU vs. TTDU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AFRU
T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF
-38.11%-42.29%
TTDU
T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF
-77.55%-37.11%

Correlation

The correlation between AFRU and TTDU is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFRU vs. TTDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU) and T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AFRU vs. TTDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFRUTTDUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.63

-0.87

+0.24

Drawdowns

AFRU vs. TTDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFRU drawdown since its inception was -84.44%, smaller than the maximum TTDU drawdown of -89.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFRU and TTDU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFRUTTDUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.44%

-89.89%

+5.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.60%

-89.89%

+24.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.01%

-59.22%

+3.21%

Volatility

AFRU vs. TTDU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFRUTTDUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

121.30%

107.88%

+13.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

121.30%

107.88%

+13.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

121.30%

107.88%

+13.42%

AFRU vs. TTDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AFRU and TTDU have an expense ratio of 1.50%.


Dividends

AFRU vs. TTDU - Dividend Comparison

Neither AFRU nor TTDU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AFRU and TTDU have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AFRU and TTDU have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

AFRU and TTDU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFRU and TTDU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer