AFRU vs. AAPX
AFRU (T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF) and AAPX (T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from T-Rex. Both are actively managed. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AFRU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for AAPX.
Performance
AFRU vs. AAPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFRU achieves a -25.77% return, which is significantly lower than AAPX's 11.18% return.
AFRU
- 1D
- 12.30%
- 1M
- -23.10%
- 6M
- 12.07%
- YTD
- -25.77%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
AAPX
- 1D
- -4.35%
- 1M
- -5.29%
- 6M
- 14.57%
- YTD
- 11.18%
- 1Y
- 87.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.19M | $2.07M | $2.17M | |
| $104.61K | $177.04K | $503.55K |
AFRU vs. AAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AFRU T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF | -25.77% | -38.81% |
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF | 11.18% | 25.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFRU and AAPX is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFRU vs. AAPX — Risk / Return Rank
AFRU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AAPX
AFRU vs. AAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU) and T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFRU | AAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.92 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFRU vs. AAPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFRU drawdown since its inception was -84.44%, which is greater than AAPX's maximum drawdown of -58.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFRU and AAPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFRU | AAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.44% | -58.55% | -25.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -30.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.74% | -21.02% | -37.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.03% | -18.65% | -37.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 13.31% | — |
Volatility
AFRU vs. AAPX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFRU | AAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 21.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 41.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 120.68% | 51.74% | +68.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 120.68% | 55.85% | +64.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 120.68% | 55.85% | +64.83% |
AFRU vs. AAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFRU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AAPX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFRU vs. AAPX - Dividend Comparison
AFRU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF | 0.60% | 0.67% | 21.46% |
AFRU T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFRU and AAPX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AAPX is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AAPX is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for AFRU.
AAPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for AFRU.
Their fees differ too: 1.50% for AFRU and 1.05% for AAPX.
Find the right allocation for AFRU and AAPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer