AFLG vs. CIBR
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR).
AFLG and CIBR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AFLG is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index. It was launched on Dec 3, 2019. CIBR is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. It was launched on Jul 7, 2015. Both AFLG and CIBR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
AFLG vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AFLG vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFLG First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF | -1.22% | 14.23% | 27.02% | 20.10% | -16.41% | 27.29% | 10.31% | 2.77% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | -11.46% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 0.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFLG achieves a -1.22% return, which is significantly higher than CIBR's -11.46% return.
AFLG
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- -1.22%
- 6M
- -0.03%
- 1Y
- 15.42%
- 3Y*
- 18.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.13%
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- -11.46%
- 6M
- -17.11%
- 1Y
- -0.01%
- 3Y*
- 14.39%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AFLG vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFLG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AFLG vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
AFLG
CIBR
AFLG vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFLG | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | -0.00 | +0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 0.17 | +1.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.02 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 0.04 | +1.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.45 | 0.10 | +6.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFLG | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | -0.00 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.36 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.52 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between AFLG and CIBR is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AFLG vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
AFLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than CIBR's 0.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFLG First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF | 0.80% | 0.84% | 0.53% | 1.53% | 1.52% | 0.93% | 1.28% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.65% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
Drawdowns
AFLG vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFLG drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFLG and CIBR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFLG | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.84% | -33.89% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -21.96% | +9.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.48% | -33.89% | +10.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.59% | -18.89% | +13.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.85% | -8.66% | +2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | 8.11% | -5.57% |
Volatility
AFLG vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) is 5.13%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that AFLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AFLG | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 7.03% | -1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.15% | 16.47% | -7.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.34% | 24.46% | -7.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.85% | 24.20% | -8.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.37% | 23.22% | -3.85% |