PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AFLG vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AFLG and BDGS is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

AFLG vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
12.92%
11.09%
AFLG
BDGS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AFLG:

2.22

BDGS:

4.00

Sortino Ratio

AFLG:

3.00

BDGS:

7.08

Omega Ratio

AFLG:

1.39

BDGS:

2.25

Calmar Ratio

AFLG:

3.73

BDGS:

8.74

Martin Ratio

AFLG:

12.51

BDGS:

38.46

Ulcer Index

AFLG:

2.19%

BDGS:

0.54%

Daily Std Dev

AFLG:

12.35%

BDGS:

5.24%

Max Drawdown

AFLG:

-35.84%

BDGS:

-5.38%

Current Drawdown

AFLG:

-1.50%

BDGS:

-0.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFLG achieves a 3.59% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 2.51% return.


AFLG

YTD

3.59%

1M

3.59%

6M

12.91%

1Y

28.88%

5Y*

13.38%

10Y*

N/A

BDGS

YTD

2.51%

1M

2.51%

6M

11.09%

1Y

21.18%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AFLG vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFLG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
Expense ratio chart for BDGS: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%
Expense ratio chart for AFLG: current value at 0.55% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.55%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AFLG vs. BDGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFLG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AFLG is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AFLG is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AFLG is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AFLG is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AFLG is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AFLG is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

BDGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDGS is 9898
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AFLG vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AFLG, currently valued at 2.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.224.00
The chart of Sortino ratio for AFLG, currently valued at 3.00, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.007.08
The chart of Omega ratio for AFLG, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.392.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for AFLG, currently valued at 3.73, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.738.74
The chart of Martin ratio for AFLG, currently valued at 12.51, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0012.5138.46
AFLG
BDGS

The current AFLG Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 4.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFLG and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.504.004.505.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.22
4.00
AFLG
BDGS

Dividends

AFLG vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

AFLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than BDGS's 1.77% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019
AFLG
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF
0.51%0.53%1.53%1.51%0.93%1.28%0.20%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
1.77%1.81%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AFLG vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFLG drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFLG and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-1.50%
-0.20%
AFLG
BDGS

Volatility

AFLG vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 2.60%. This indicates that AFLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.67%
2.60%
AFLG
BDGS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab