AFLG vs. BDGS

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

AFLG (First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AFLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while BDGS is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Bridges. AFLG is passively managed, while BDGS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, AFLG returned 21.26%/yr vs 13.64%/yr for BDGS. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AFLG charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

AFLG vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFLG achieves a 13.98% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 5.44% return.

AFLG

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: 2.95%
• 6M: 10.40%
• YTD: 13.98%
• 1Y: 23.26%
• 3Y*: 21.26%
• 5Y*: 12.49%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.98%

BDGS

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: 0.33%
• 6M: 5.03%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 1Y: 11.29%
• 3Y*: 13.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AFLG First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF	$2.89M	$2.89M	$2.65M
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	$54.06K	$102.41K	$187.59K

AFLG vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AFLG First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF	13.98%	14.23%	27.02%	16.32%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	5.44%	10.61%	19.07%	8.23%

Correlation

The correlation between AFLG and BDGS is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023	0.72

The correlation between AFLG and BDGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

AFLG vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AFLG	BDGS
Technology	38.3%	38.9%
Financial Services	9.9%	9.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	12.2%
Communication Services	9.1%	15.1%
Industrials	8.8%	6.8%
Healthcare	6.9%	7.1%
Energy	4.3%	2.4%
Utilities	3.8%	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	3.6%
Basic Materials	3.2%	1.3%
Real Estate	2.5%	1.5%

Return for Risk

AFLG vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AFLG

AFLG Risk / Return Rank: 79
AFLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
AFLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
AFLG Omega Ratio Rank: 79
AFLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
AFLG Martin Ratio Rank: 84

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 73
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 76
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AFLG vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AFLG	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	1.59	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	2.45	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.32	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	2.38	+0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.27	10.11	+2.15

AFLG vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFLG Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFLG and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AFLG vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFLG drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFLG and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AFLG	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.84%	-9.12%	-26.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.19%	-4.76%	-3.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.49%	-9.12%	-8.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.01%	+1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.61%	-0.69%	-4.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	1.12%	+0.78%

Volatility

AFLG vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) is 2.79%, while Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that AFLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AFLG	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.79%	3.39%	-0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.38%	6.19%	+3.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.02%	7.13%	+4.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.87%	8.31%	+7.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.06%	8.31%	+10.75%

AFLG vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFLG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

AFLG vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

AFLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than BDGS's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AFLG First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF	0.70%	0.84%	0.53%	1.53%	1.52%	0.93%	1.28%	0.20%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.52%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AFLG and BDGS in my portfolio?

AFLG and BDGS have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AFLG or BDGS?

BDGS has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to AFLG (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFLG dropped -35.84% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

Which ETF is better, AFLG or BDGS?

On 3-year performance, AFLG leads with 21.26% vs 13.64% for BDGS. On fees, AFLG is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, AFLG has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AFLG or BDGS?

Over the 3-year period, AFLG has performed better with a 21.26% return vs 13.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AFLG or BDGS?

AFLG is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AFLG or BDGS?

AFLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.52% for BDGS.

What is the main difference between AFLG and BDGS?

AFLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BDGS is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AFLG and 0.87% for BDGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AFLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.