PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFK vs. HODL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AFK vs. HODL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AFK vs. HODL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AFK
VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF
-3.74%74.71%12.02%
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
-22.52%-6.42%99.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFK achieves a -3.74% return, which is significantly higher than HODL's -22.52% return.


AFK

1D
4.12%
1M
-15.74%
YTD
-3.74%
6M
6.76%
1Y
49.61%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
5.78%

HODL

1D
1.86%
1M
3.29%
YTD
-22.52%
6M
-40.81%
1Y
-17.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AFK vs. HODL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFK has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than HODL's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AFK vs. HODL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFK
AFK Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFK Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFK Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

HODL
HODL Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
HODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
HODL Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
HODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HODL Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFK vs. HODL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AFKHODLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.87

-0.40

+2.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.33

-0.29

+2.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

0.97

+0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

-0.39

+2.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.62

-0.83

+10.45

AFK vs. HODL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFK Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the HODL Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFK and HODL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFKHODLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

-0.40

+2.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.36

-0.37

Correlation

The correlation between AFK and HODL is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AFK vs. HODL - Dividend Comparison

AFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while HODL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFK
VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF
1.05%1.02%0.00%2.27%3.59%4.17%3.91%6.34%1.71%1.99%2.67%2.16%
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AFK vs. HODL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFK drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, which is greater than HODL's maximum drawdown of -49.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFK and HODL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AFKHODLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.46%

-49.25%

-13.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.54%

-49.25%

+29.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.74%

-46.01%

+30.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.25%

-14.09%

-18.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.02%

23.02%

-18.00%

Volatility

AFK vs. HODL - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) have volatilities of 12.80% and 13.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AFKHODLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.80%

13.04%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.11%

36.71%

-15.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.67%

45.09%

-18.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.56%

50.94%

-29.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.12%

50.94%

-28.82%