AFK vs. SMH
AFK (VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AFK is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Africa Titans 50 Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AFK returned 5.75%/yr vs 37.55%/yr for SMH. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AFK charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
AFK vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFK achieves a 3.48% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 75.55% return. Over the past 10 years, AFK has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 5.75%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.55% annualized return.
AFK
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 3.48%
- 6M
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- 44.31%
- 3Y*
- 23.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.45%
- 10Y*
- 5.75%
SMH
- 1D
- 4.01%
- 1M
- 24.01%
- YTD
- 75.55%
- 6M
- 76.44%
- 1Y
- 160.66%
- 3Y*
- 63.68%
- 5Y*
- 39.58%
- 10Y*
- 37.55%
AFK vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFK VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF | 3.48% | 74.71% | 12.10% | -12.11% | -17.31% | 3.00% | 4.26% | 9.90% | -19.55% | 28.22% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 75.55% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFK and SMH is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2008 | 0.47 |
AFK vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AFK
SMH
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
AFK
SMH
-
Basic Materials
AFK
SMH
-
Communication Services
AFK
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
AFK
SMH
-
Energy
AFK
SMH
-
Industrials
AFK
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
AFK
SMH
-
Healthcare
AFK
SMH
-
Real Estate
AFK
SMH
-
Utilities
AFK
SMH
-
Technology
AFK
-
SMH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFK vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
AFK
SMH
AFK vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 5.29 | -3.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | 5.29 | -3.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.73 | -0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 11.02 | -8.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.38 | 42.34 | -34.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 5.29 | -3.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 1.14 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 1.16 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.34 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
AFK vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFK drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFK and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.46% | -84.96% | +22.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.54% | -14.93% | -4.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.54% | -35.74% | +16.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.46% | -45.30% | +6.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.33% | -45.30% | -8.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.42% | 0.00% | -9.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.04% | -41.09% | +9.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.45% | 3.89% | +2.56% |
Volatility
AFK vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) is 8.12%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.59%. This indicates that AFK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.12% | 11.59% | -3.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.33% | 24.29% | -1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.62% | 30.57% | -4.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.07% | 35.02% | -12.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.16% | 32.58% | -10.42% |
AFK vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFK has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFK vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
AFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFK VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF | 0.98% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 2.27% | 3.59% | 4.17% | 3.91% | 6.34% | 1.71% | 1.99% | 2.67% | 2.16% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFK and SMH have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (11.59%) compared to AFK (8.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFK dropped -62.46% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.55% vs 5.75% for AFK. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, AFK has been the lower-risk option at 8.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.55% return vs 5.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for AFK.
AFK has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.17% for SMH.
AFK is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. AFK tracks Dow Jones Africa Titans 50 Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for AFK and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.29 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFK and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer