AFK vs. RDIV
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV).
AFK and RDIV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AFK is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Africa Titans 50 Index. It was launched on Jul 10, 2008. RDIV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. It was launched on Oct 1, 2013. Both AFK and RDIV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AFK or RDIV.
Correlation
The correlation between AFK and RDIV is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
AFK vs. RDIV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AFK:
0.76
RDIV:
1.24
AFK:
1.13
RDIV:
1.77
AFK:
1.14
RDIV:
1.22
AFK:
0.32
RDIV:
1.96
AFK:
3.68
RDIV:
7.14
AFK:
4.61%
RDIV:
2.47%
AFK:
22.20%
RDIV:
14.26%
AFK:
-62.45%
RDIV:
-49.97%
AFK:
-41.37%
RDIV:
-7.58%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AFK having a 14.86% return and RDIV slightly higher at 15.23%. Over the past 10 years, AFK has underperformed RDIV with an annualized return of -1.93%, while RDIV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.08% annualized return.
AFK
14.86%
0.32%
-0.38%
15.44%
-1.70%
-1.93%
RDIV
15.23%
-4.54%
10.69%
16.37%
8.67%
9.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AFK vs. RDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFK has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than RDIV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AFK vs. RDIV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AFK vs. RDIV - Dividend Comparison
AFK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFK VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF | 0.00% | 2.28% | 3.59% | 4.17% | 3.91% | 6.34% | 1.71% | 1.99% | 2.67% | 2.16% | 2.92% | 2.68% |
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 2.97% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 3.32% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.26% | 3.12% | 4.49% | 3.36% | 0.92% |
Drawdowns
AFK vs. RDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFK drawdown since its inception was -62.45%, which is greater than RDIV's maximum drawdown of -49.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFK and RDIV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AFK vs. RDIV - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) at 4.11%. This indicates that AFK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.