AESR vs. UGA
AESR (Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - AESR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Regents Park Funds, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. AESR is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AESR returned 14.60%/yr vs 22.69%/yr for UGA. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AESR charges 1.46%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
AESR vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AESR achieves a 18.68% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return.
AESR
- 1D
- -3.27%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- 18.68%
- 6M
- 17.04%
- 1Y
- 33.70%
- 3Y*
- 25.33%
- 5Y*
- 14.60%
- 10Y*
- —
UGA
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -12.11%
- YTD
- 64.09%
- 6M
- 60.42%
- 1Y
- 59.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.95%
- 5Y*
- 22.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
AESR vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AESR Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF | 18.68% | 20.34% | 25.37% | 21.03% | -17.52% | 25.26% | 19.58% | 0.76% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 64.09% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between AESR and UGA is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019 | 0.15 |
The correlation between AESR and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AESR vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
AESR
UGA
AESR vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AESR | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.30 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.45 | 3.17 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.98 | 9.39 | +4.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AESR vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AESR drawdown since its inception was -31.06%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AESR and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AESR | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.06% | -86.59% | +55.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | -18.96% | +9.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.85% | -26.68% | +6.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.04% | -38.11% | +13.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | -18.05% | +14.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -36.69% | +30.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 6.43% | -4.01% |
Volatility
AESR vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) have volatilities of 9.07% and 9.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AESR | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.07% | 9.24% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.09% | 30.57% | -15.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.23% | 35.22% | -16.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 34.45% | -16.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 37.22% | -16.59% |
AESR vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
AESR has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AESR vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
AESR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.39%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AESR Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF | 19.39% | 23.02% | 0.17% | 0.33% | 0.73% | 6.59% | 1.06% | 0.33% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AESR and UGA have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to AESR (9.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AESR dropped -31.06% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 22.69% vs 14.60% for AESR. On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, AESR has been the lower-risk option at 9.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 22.69% return vs 14.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for AESR.
AESR has the higher dividend yield at 19.39%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
AESR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for AESR and 0.75% for UGA.
AESR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AESR and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer