PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AES vs. WM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

AES vs. WM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The AES Corporation (AES) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AES vs. WM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AES
The AES Corporation
-0.58%18.26%-30.40%-30.88%21.69%5.94%22.16%42.14%39.02%-2.69%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
5.00%10.50%14.28%16.20%-4.49%43.82%5.46%30.45%5.32%24.46%

Fundamentals

EPS

AES:

$1.91

WM:

$6.70

PE Ratio

AES:

7.36

WM:

34.31

PEG Ratio

AES:

0.04

WM:

2.81

PS Ratio

AES:

0.44

WM:

3.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

AES:

$15.16B

WM:

$25.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AES:

$5.45B

WM:

$7.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

AES:

$4.56B

WM:

$7.27B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AES achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly lower than WM's 5.00% return. Over the past 10 years, AES has underperformed WM with an annualized return of 5.87%, while WM has yielded a comparatively higher 16.64% annualized return.


AES

1D
0.50%
1M
-18.46%
YTD
-0.58%
6M
9.71%
1Y
19.93%
3Y*
-12.44%
5Y*
-8.86%
10Y*
5.87%

WM

1D
-0.07%
1M
-4.21%
YTD
5.00%
6M
4.88%
1Y
0.76%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
13.95%
10Y*
16.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AES vs. WM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AES
AES Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
AES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AES Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
AES Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
AES Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AES Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

WM
WM Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
WM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
WM Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
WM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
WM Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AES vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The AES Corporation (AES) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AESWMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.40

0.04

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.92

0.18

+0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.02

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

0.13

+0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.88

0.31

+1.57

AES vs. WM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AES Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the WM Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AES and WM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AESWMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

0.04

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

0.77

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.86

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.37

-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between AES and WM is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AES vs. WM - Dividend Comparison

AES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than WM's 1.49% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AES
The AES Corporation
5.00%4.91%5.36%3.45%2.20%2.48%2.44%2.74%3.60%4.43%3.79%4.18%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
1.49%1.50%1.49%1.56%1.66%1.38%1.85%1.80%2.09%1.97%2.31%2.89%

Drawdowns

AES vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AES drawdown since its inception was -98.65%, which is greater than WM's maximum drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AES and WM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AESWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.65%

-77.85%

-20.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.27%

-18.14%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.43%

-18.14%

-45.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.43%

-30.07%

-33.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.05%

-6.41%

-57.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.99%

-17.74%

-39.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.66%

7.53%

+3.13%

Volatility

AES vs. WM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The AES Corporation (AES) is 1.54%, while Waste Management, Inc. (WM) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that AES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AESWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.54%

5.94%

-4.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.76%

13.99%

+18.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.97%

19.06%

+30.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.05%

18.30%

+19.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.18%

19.38%

+16.80%

Financials

AES vs. WM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The AES Corporation and Waste Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
6.03B
6.31B
(AES) Total Revenue
(WM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AES vs. WM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The AES Corporation and Waste Management, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
63.4%
29.3%
Portfolio components
AES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The AES Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.82B and revenue of 6.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.4%.

WM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.85B and revenue of 6.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.3%.

AES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The AES Corporation reported an operating income of -1.12B and revenue of 6.03B, resulting in an operating margin of -18.6%.

WM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.18B and revenue of 6.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.

AES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The AES Corporation reported a net income of 335.00M and revenue of 6.03B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.

WM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a net income of 742.00M and revenue of 6.31B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.