AES vs. WM
Compare and contrast key facts about The AES Corporation (AES) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AES or WM.
Correlation
The correlation between AES and WM is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
AES vs. WM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AES:
-0.97
WM:
0.61
AES:
-1.17
WM:
0.93
AES:
0.85
WM:
1.14
AES:
-0.47
WM:
1.02
AES:
-1.13
WM:
2.31
AES:
33.51%
WM:
5.28%
AES:
43.03%
WM:
20.02%
AES:
-98.65%
WM:
-77.85%
AES:
-76.25%
WM:
-1.72%
Fundamentals
AES:
$7.25B
WM:
$94.14B
AES:
$1.84
WM:
$6.64
AES:
5.53
WM:
35.23
AES:
1.09
WM:
3.03
AES:
0.60
WM:
4.11
AES:
2.09
WM:
10.88
AES:
$12.12B
WM:
$22.92B
AES:
$2.14B
WM:
$8.49B
AES:
$3.01B
WM:
$6.60B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AES achieves a -10.65% return, which is significantly lower than WM's 15.77% return. Over the past 10 years, AES has underperformed WM with an annualized return of 1.57%, while WM has yielded a comparatively higher 19.12% annualized return.
AES
-10.65%
1.61%
-15.45%
-41.30%
0.57%
1.57%
WM
15.77%
3.71%
4.59%
12.17%
20.19%
19.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AES vs. WM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AES
WM
AES vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The AES Corporation (AES) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AES vs. WM - Dividend Comparison
AES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.28%, more than WM's 1.32% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AES The AES Corporation | 6.28% | 5.38% | 3.45% | 2.20% | 2.49% | 2.43% | 2.75% | 3.60% | 4.43% | 3.79% | 4.18% | 1.45% |
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 1.32% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 1.38% | 1.85% | 1.80% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 2.31% | 2.89% | 2.92% |
Drawdowns
AES vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AES drawdown since its inception was -98.65%, which is greater than WM's maximum drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AES and WM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AES vs. WM - Volatility Comparison
The AES Corporation (AES) has a higher volatility of 13.16% compared to Waste Management, Inc. (WM) at 3.87%. This indicates that AES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AES vs. WM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The AES Corporation and Waste Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AES vs. WM - Profitability Comparison
AES - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The AES Corporation reported a gross profit of 441.00M and revenue of 2.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.
WM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Waste Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.37B and revenue of 6.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.
AES - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The AES Corporation reported an operating income of 364.00M and revenue of 2.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.4%.
WM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Waste Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.01B and revenue of 6.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.8%.
AES - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The AES Corporation reported a net income of 46.00M and revenue of 2.93B, resulting in a net margin of 1.6%.
WM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Waste Management, Inc. reported a net income of 637.00M and revenue of 6.02B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.