AEM vs. FDL
AEM (Agnico Eagle Mines Limited) is a stock, while FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) is Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Over the past 10 years, AEM returned 13.66%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for FDL. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AEM vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEM achieves a -7.48% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 12.82% return. Over the past 10 years, AEM has outperformed FDL with an annualized return of 13.66%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively lower 11.24% annualized return.
AEM
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -13.29%
- YTD
- -7.48%
- 6M
- -13.51%
- 1Y
- 31.61%
- 3Y*
- 49.77%
- 5Y*
- 23.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.66%
FDL
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- 12.82%
- 6M
- 12.61%
- 1Y
- 23.52%
- 3Y*
- 18.84%
- 5Y*
- 13.04%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
AEM vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | -7.48% | 119.53% | 46.04% | 8.98% | 1.08% | -22.81% | 17.39% | 54.18% | -11.51% | 10.92% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 12.82% | 14.79% | 17.98% | 2.94% | 6.66% | 26.10% | -4.30% | 24.41% | -5.99% | 12.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEM and FDL is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2006 | 0.14 |
The correlation between AEM and FDL shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEM vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
AEM
FDL
AEM vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AEM | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.36 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 5.53 | -4.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.09 | 12.87 | -10.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AEM vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEM drawdown since its inception was -90.49%, which is greater than FDL's maximum drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEM and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEM | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.49% | -65.93% | -24.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.39% | -4.27% | -35.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.39% | -12.24% | -27.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.97% | -16.46% | -25.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.86% | -41.40% | -12.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.92% | -2.96% | -34.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.64% | -9.63% | -37.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.19% | 1.83% | +13.36% |
Volatility
AEM vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) has a higher volatility of 16.09% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 3.39%. This indicates that AEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEM | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.09% | 3.39% | +12.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.69% | 8.09% | +28.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.90% | 11.55% | +33.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.18% | 14.31% | +22.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.42% | 17.10% | +20.32% |
Dividends
AEM vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
AEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than FDL's 4.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 1.09% | 0.94% | 2.05% | 2.92% | 3.08% | 2.63% | 2.36% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.89% | 0.86% | 1.22% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 4.69% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AEM and FDL have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AEM has higher volatility (16.09%) compared to FDL (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEM dropped -90.49% vs FDL's -65.93%.
FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AEM and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer