PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEM vs. NEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AEM vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEM achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly lower than NEM's 2.40% return. Over the past 10 years, AEM has outperformed NEM with an annualized return of 14.52%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively lower 13.34% annualized return.


AEM

1D
0.11%
1M
-4.92%
YTD
-1.16%
6M
-6.98%
1Y
39.16%
3Y*
53.19%
5Y*
24.66%
10Y*
14.52%

NEM

1D
-1.92%
1M
-5.20%
YTD
2.40%
6M
-2.51%
1Y
76.68%
3Y*
37.78%
5Y*
13.44%
10Y*
13.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEM vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
-1.16%119.53%46.04%8.98%1.08%-22.81%17.39%54.18%-11.51%10.92%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
2.40%172.82%-7.83%-8.76%-20.77%7.40%40.28%30.52%-6.15%10.91%

Correlation

The correlation between AEM and NEM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 1984

0.65

The correlation between AEM and NEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

AEM:

$10.60

NEM:

$6.34

PE Ratio

AEM:

15.75

NEM:

16.06

PEG Ratio

AEM:

0.25

NEM:

0.42

PS Ratio

AEM:

6.22

NEM:

4.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

AEM:

$13.51B

NEM:

$17.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AEM:

$8.28B

NEM:

$8.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

AEM:

$9.72B

NEM:

$13.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEM vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEM
AEM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
AEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEM vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AEMNEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.27

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

2.62

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.69

6.93

-4.25

AEM vs. NEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEM and NEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AEM vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEM drawdown since its inception was -90.49%, which is greater than NEM's maximum drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEM and NEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEMNEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.49%

-81.30%

-9.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.39%

-29.39%

-10.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.39%

-36.57%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.97%

-62.40%

+20.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.86%

-62.40%

+8.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.68%

-22.51%

-11.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.64%

-41.36%

-5.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.62%

11.10%

+3.52%

Volatility

AEM vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and Newmont Corporation (NEM) have volatilities of 15.34% and 15.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEMNEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.34%

15.39%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.50%

37.61%

-1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.59%

47.72%

-3.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.08%

38.00%

-0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.41%

35.73%

+1.68%

Dividends

AEM vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

AEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than NEM's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
1.02%0.94%2.05%2.92%3.08%2.63%2.36%0.89%1.09%0.89%0.86%1.22%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.00%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%

Financials

AEM vs. NEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
4.10B
0
(AEM) Total Revenue
(NEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AEM and NEM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEM has higher volatility (15.39%) compared to AEM (15.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEM dropped -90.49% vs NEM's -81.30%.

NEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEM and NEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer