PortfoliosLab logo
AEM vs. PAAS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AEM and PAAS is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

AEM vs. PAAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AEM:

1.68

PAAS:

0.23

Sortino Ratio

AEM:

2.22

PAAS:

0.80

Omega Ratio

AEM:

1.30

PAAS:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

AEM:

3.40

PAAS:

0.34

Martin Ratio

AEM:

11.43

PAAS:

1.41

Ulcer Index

AEM:

5.28%

PAAS:

11.72%

Daily Std Dev

AEM:

34.24%

PAAS:

51.68%

Max Drawdown

AEM:

-90.33%

PAAS:

-85.10%

Current Drawdown

AEM:

-13.74%

PAAS:

-36.09%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AEM:

$53.70B

PAAS:

$8.32B

EPS

AEM:

$4.60

PAAS:

$0.84

PE Ratio

AEM:

22.78

PAAS:

26.92

PEG Ratio

AEM:

28.15

PAAS:

7.59

PS Ratio

AEM:

6.02

PAAS:

2.78

PB Ratio

AEM:

2.44

PAAS:

1.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

AEM:

$8.94B

PAAS:

$2.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AEM:

$4.30B

PAAS:

$709.78M

EBITDA (TTM)

AEM:

$5.17B

PAAS:

$1.27B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEM achieves a 36.76% return, which is significantly higher than PAAS's 13.48% return. Over the past 10 years, AEM has outperformed PAAS with an annualized return of 14.23%, while PAAS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.84% annualized return.


AEM

YTD

36.76%

1M

-11.66%

6M

38.43%

1Y

57.21%

5Y*

11.98%

10Y*

14.23%

PAAS

YTD

13.48%

1M

-16.79%

6M

5.37%

1Y

11.84%

5Y*

0.46%

10Y*

9.84%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AEM vs. PAAS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AEM is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AEM is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AEM is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AEM is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AEM is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AEM is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

PAAS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PAAS is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PAAS is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PAAS is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PAAS is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PAAS is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PAAS is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AEM vs. PAAS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the PAAS Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEM and PAAS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

AEM vs. PAAS - Dividend Comparison

AEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than PAAS's 1.75% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
1.50%2.05%2.92%3.08%2.63%1.35%1.10%1.09%0.89%0.86%1.22%1.29%
PAAS
Pan American Silver Corp.
1.75%1.98%2.45%2.75%1.36%0.64%0.59%0.96%0.64%0.33%4.23%5.43%

Drawdowns

AEM vs. PAAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEM drawdown since its inception was -90.33%, which is greater than PAAS's maximum drawdown of -85.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEM and PAAS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

AEM vs. PAAS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is 13.63%, while Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) has a volatility of 21.58%. This indicates that AEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

AEM vs. PAAS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and Pan American Silver Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
2.47B
773.20M
(AEM) Total Revenue
(PAAS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AEM vs. PAAS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and Pan American Silver Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
52.0%
32.4%
(AEM) Gross Margin
(PAAS) Gross Margin
AEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 1.28B and revenue of 2.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.

PAAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Pan American Silver Corp. reported a gross profit of 250.80M and revenue of 773.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.4%.

AEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 47.0%.

PAAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Pan American Silver Corp. reported an operating income of 228.20M and revenue of 773.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.5%.

AEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 814.73M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in a net margin of 33.0%.

PAAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Pan American Silver Corp. reported a net income of 168.70M and revenue of 773.20M, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.