PortfoliosLab logo
AEM vs. GFI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AEM and GFI is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

AEM vs. GFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AEM:

1.70

GFI:

0.73

Sortino Ratio

AEM:

2.16

GFI:

1.01

Omega Ratio

AEM:

1.30

GFI:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

AEM:

3.28

GFI:

0.88

Martin Ratio

AEM:

10.88

GFI:

1.94

Ulcer Index

AEM:

5.35%

GFI:

13.77%

Daily Std Dev

AEM:

34.24%

GFI:

48.38%

Max Drawdown

AEM:

-90.33%

GFI:

-86.05%

Current Drawdown

AEM:

-13.78%

GFI:

-16.34%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AEM:

$53.63B

GFI:

$18.61B

EPS

AEM:

$4.78

GFI:

$1.38

PE Ratio

AEM:

22.28

GFI:

15.07

PEG Ratio

AEM:

28.15

GFI:

0.00

PS Ratio

AEM:

6.01

GFI:

3.58

PB Ratio

AEM:

2.48

GFI:

3.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

AEM:

$8.94B

GFI:

$5.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AEM:

$4.30B

GFI:

$2.58B

EBITDA (TTM)

AEM:

$5.17B

GFI:

$2.71B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEM achieves a 36.68% return, which is significantly lower than GFI's 59.33% return. Over the past 10 years, AEM has underperformed GFI with an annualized return of 14.72%, while GFI has yielded a comparatively higher 21.84% annualized return.


AEM

YTD

36.68%

1M

-13.13%

6M

39.93%

1Y

57.79%

5Y*

11.96%

10Y*

14.72%

GFI

YTD

59.33%

1M

-16.34%

6M

53.96%

1Y

34.82%

5Y*

23.47%

10Y*

21.84%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AEM vs. GFI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AEM is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AEM is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AEM is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AEM is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AEM is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AEM is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

GFI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GFI is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GFI is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GFI is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GFI is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GFI is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GFI is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AEM vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the GFI Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEM and GFI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

AEM vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison

AEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than GFI's 2.64% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
1.50%2.05%2.92%3.08%2.63%1.35%1.10%1.09%0.89%0.86%1.22%1.29%
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
2.64%2.96%2.85%3.29%3.29%1.68%0.82%1.57%1.78%1.58%0.70%0.85%

Drawdowns

AEM vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEM drawdown since its inception was -90.33%, roughly equal to the maximum GFI drawdown of -86.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEM and GFI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

AEM vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is 13.44%, while Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a volatility of 17.87%. This indicates that AEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

AEM vs. GFI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20212022202320242025
2.47B
3.08B
(AEM) Total Revenue
(GFI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AEM vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and Gold Fields Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
52.0%
60.1%
(AEM) Gross Margin
(GFI) Gross Margin
AEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 1.28B and revenue of 2.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.

GFI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 1.85B and revenue of 3.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.1%.

AEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 47.0%.

GFI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 1.77B and revenue of 3.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 57.5%.

AEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 814.73M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in a net margin of 33.0%.

GFI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 856.00M and revenue of 3.08B, resulting in a net margin of 27.8%.