AEM vs. GFI
Compare and contrast key facts about Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AEM or GFI.
Correlation
The correlation between AEM and GFI is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
AEM vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AEM:
2.65
GFI:
1.06
AEM:
3.14
GFI:
1.51
AEM:
1.41
GFI:
1.20
AEM:
3.53
GFI:
1.55
AEM:
16.72
GFI:
3.06
AEM:
4.72%
GFI:
15.36%
AEM:
29.83%
GFI:
44.38%
AEM:
-90.33%
GFI:
-86.05%
AEM:
-0.81%
GFI:
-0.13%
Fundamentals
AEM:
$54.10B
GFI:
$12.55B
AEM:
$3.78
GFI:
$0.71
AEM:
28.45
GFI:
19.75
AEM:
28.15
GFI:
0.00
AEM:
$6.47B
GFI:
$5.20B
AEM:
$2.96B
GFI:
$2.58B
AEM:
$3.55B
GFI:
$2.71B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEM achieves a 38.07% return, which is significantly lower than GFI's 75.46% return. Over the past 10 years, AEM has underperformed GFI with an annualized return of 15.87%, while GFI has yielded a comparatively higher 21.10% annualized return.
AEM
38.07%
12.09%
32.97%
80.39%
22.42%
15.87%
GFI
75.46%
25.81%
44.21%
45.07%
38.84%
21.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AEM vs. GFI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AEM
GFI
AEM vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AEM vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
AEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than GFI's 2.39% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 1.49% | 2.05% | 2.92% | 3.08% | 2.63% | 1.35% | 1.10% | 1.09% | 0.89% | 0.86% | 1.22% | 1.29% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 2.39% | 2.94% | 2.86% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.73% | 0.80% | 1.62% | 1.77% | 1.69% | 0.72% | 0.86% |
Drawdowns
AEM vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEM drawdown since its inception was -90.33%, roughly equal to the maximum GFI drawdown of -86.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEM and GFI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AEM vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is 7.04%, while Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a volatility of 10.95%. This indicates that AEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AEM vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities