PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AEM vs. GFI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AEM and GFI is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

AEM vs. GFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%140.00%160.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
134.96%
48.85%
AEM
GFI

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AEM:

1.59

GFI:

-0.22

Sortino Ratio

AEM:

2.09

GFI:

0.02

Omega Ratio

AEM:

1.26

GFI:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

AEM:

1.12

GFI:

-0.37

Martin Ratio

AEM:

7.33

GFI:

-0.66

Ulcer Index

AEM:

6.56%

GFI:

15.53%

Daily Std Dev

AEM:

30.21%

GFI:

47.59%

Max Drawdown

AEM:

-90.33%

GFI:

-86.06%

Current Drawdown

AEM:

-11.61%

GFI:

-27.08%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AEM:

$41.22B

GFI:

$12.55B

EPS

AEM:

$1.98

GFI:

$0.71

PE Ratio

AEM:

41.28

GFI:

19.75

PEG Ratio

AEM:

28.15

GFI:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

AEM:

$7.88B

GFI:

$4.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AEM:

$3.06B

GFI:

$1.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

AEM:

$3.38B

GFI:

$1.89B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEM achieves a 45.94% return, which is significantly higher than GFI's -2.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AEM having a 15.11% annualized return and GFI not far behind at 14.99%.


AEM

YTD

45.94%

1M

-5.15%

6M

20.99%

1Y

46.53%

5Y*

8.92%

10Y*

15.11%

GFI

YTD

-2.07%

1M

-7.70%

6M

-4.91%

1Y

-11.49%

5Y*

21.96%

10Y*

14.99%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AEM vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AEM, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.59-0.22
The chart of Sortino ratio for AEM, currently valued at 2.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.090.02
The chart of Omega ratio for AEM, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.261.00
The chart of Calmar ratio for AEM, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.12-0.37
The chart of Martin ratio for AEM, currently valued at 7.33, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.007.33-0.66
AEM
GFI

The current AEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the GFI Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEM and GFI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.59
-0.22
AEM
GFI

Dividends

AEM vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison

AEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than GFI's 2.81% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
2.05%2.92%3.08%2.63%1.35%1.10%1.09%0.89%0.86%1.22%1.29%3.34%
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
2.81%2.86%3.40%3.24%1.73%0.80%1.62%1.77%1.69%0.72%0.86%2.66%

Drawdowns

AEM vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEM drawdown since its inception was -90.33%, roughly equal to the maximum GFI drawdown of -86.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEM and GFI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-11.61%
-27.08%
AEM
GFI

Volatility

AEM vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison

Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) has a higher volatility of 9.92% compared to Gold Fields Limited (GFI) at 8.54%. This indicates that AEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
9.92%
8.54%
AEM
GFI

Financials

AEM vs. GFI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab