PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACWX vs. TLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACWX vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWX achieves a 15.52% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's 0.13% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWX has outperformed TLT with an annualized return of 9.68%, while TLT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.62% annualized return.


ACWX

1D
0.79%
1M
5.30%
YTD
15.52%
6M
18.73%
1Y
32.87%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
9.68%

TLT

1D
0.21%
1M
0.44%
YTD
0.13%
6M
-1.35%
1Y
5.16%
3Y*
-1.67%
5Y*
-5.98%
10Y*
-1.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWX vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
15.52%32.59%5.17%15.63%-16.07%7.67%10.29%21.05%-13.99%27.20%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
0.13%4.25%-8.05%2.77%-31.23%-4.60%18.15%14.12%-1.61%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWX and TLT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2008

-0.22

The correlation between ACWX and TLT shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACWX vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWX
ACWX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ACWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWX vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACWXTLTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.14

0.53

+1.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.93

0.83

+2.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.09

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

0.55

+2.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.72

1.38

+10.33

ACWX vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the TLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWX and TLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACWXTLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

0.53

+1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

-0.38

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

-0.11

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.26

-0.02

Drawdowns

ACWX vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWX drawdown since its inception was -60.40%, which is greater than TLT's maximum drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWX and TLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACWXTLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.40%

-48.35%

-12.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.42%

-7.58%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-19.18%

+5.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.07%

-43.70%

+13.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.38%

-48.35%

+12.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-40.20%

+40.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.34%

-13.81%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.02%

-0.09%

Volatility

ACWX vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 2.84%. This indicates that ACWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACWXTLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

2.84%

+2.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.22%

6.60%

+6.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.50%

9.81%

+5.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.28%

15.87%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.38%

14.91%

+2.47%

ACWX vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACWX vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

ACWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than TLT's 4.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
2.44%2.82%2.97%2.96%2.68%2.74%1.88%3.22%2.60%2.40%2.77%2.51%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.57%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACWX and TLT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACWX has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to TLT (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWX dropped -60.40% vs TLT's -48.35%.

On 10-year performance, ACWX leads with 9.68% vs -1.62% for TLT. On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ACWX has performed better with a 9.68% return vs -1.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWX.

TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 2.44% for ACWX.

ACWX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while TLT is Government Bonds. ACWX tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ACWX and 0.15% for TLT.

ACWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWX and TLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer