ACWX vs. SPDW
ACWX (iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF) and SPDW (SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - ACWX tracks the MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index while SPDW tracks the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWX returned 10.06%/yr vs 10.63%/yr for SPDW. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ACWX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPDW.
Performance
ACWX vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ACWX having a 12.88% return and SPDW slightly higher at 13.29%. Over the past 10 years, ACWX has underperformed SPDW with an annualized return of 10.06%, while SPDW has yielded a comparatively higher 10.63% annualized return.
ACWX
- 1D
- -3.17%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 12.88%
- 6M
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 29.85%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 10.06%
SPDW
- 1D
- -2.99%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 13.29%
- 6M
- 13.11%
- 1Y
- 30.23%
- 3Y*
- 19.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.63%
ACWX vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 12.88% | 32.59% | 5.17% | 15.63% | -16.07% | 7.67% | 10.29% | 21.05% | -13.99% | 27.20% |
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 13.29% | 34.75% | 3.55% | 17.81% | -15.98% | 11.45% | 9.90% | 22.41% | -14.22% | 25.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWX and SPDW is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008 | 0.95 |
The correlation between ACWX and SPDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
ACWX vs. SPDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACWX
SPDW
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
ACWX
SPDW
Financial Services
ACWX
SPDW
Industrials
ACWX
SPDW
Consumer Cyclical
ACWX
SPDW
Basic Materials
ACWX
SPDW
Healthcare
ACWX
SPDW
Consumer Defensive
ACWX
SPDW
Communication Services
ACWX
SPDW
Energy
ACWX
SPDW
Utilities
ACWX
SPDW
Real Estate
ACWX
SPDW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACWX vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank
ACWX
SPDW
ACWX vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACWX | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.33 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 2.63 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.05 | 10.15 | -0.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACWX vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWX drawdown since its inception was -60.40%, roughly equal to the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWX and SPDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWX | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.40% | -60.02% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.42% | -11.55% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.84% | -13.53% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.78% | -30.21% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.38% | -34.98% | -0.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.17% | -2.99% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.30% | -12.88% | -0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 2.99% | -0.01% |
Volatility
ACWX vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) have volatilities of 7.37% and 7.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACWX | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.37% | 7.05% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.77% | 14.59% | +0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.74% | 16.72% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 16.70% | -0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 17.13% | +0.14% |
ACWX vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACWX vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison
ACWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than SPDW's 3.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 2.54% | 2.82% | 2.97% | 2.96% | 2.68% | 2.74% | 1.88% | 3.22% | 2.60% | 2.40% | 2.77% | 2.51% |
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 3.06% | 3.30% | 3.19% | 2.75% | 3.12% | 3.04% | 1.87% | 3.13% | 3.08% | 1.86% | 3.11% | 2.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, ACWX and SPDW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ACWX has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to SPDW (7.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWX dropped -60.40% vs SPDW's -60.02%.
On 10-year performance, SPDW leads with 10.63% vs 10.06% for ACWX. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPDW has been the lower-risk option at 7.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPDW has performed better with a 10.63% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWX.
SPDW has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 2.54% for ACWX.
ACWX tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ACWX and 0.04% for SPDW.
SPDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACWX and SPDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer