PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACN vs. HUBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ACN vs. HUBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Accenture plc (ACN) and HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACN achieves a -35.62% return, which is significantly higher than HUBS's -53.16% return. Over the past 10 years, ACN has underperformed HUBS with an annualized return of 5.50%, while HUBS has yielded a comparatively higher 14.57% annualized return.


ACN

1D
1.65%
1M
6.66%
YTD
-35.62%
6M
-36.39%
1Y
-45.08%
3Y*
-16.94%
5Y*
-8.24%
10Y*
5.50%

HUBS

1D
0.83%
1M
5.02%
YTD
-53.16%
6M
-50.00%
1Y
-67.01%
3Y*
-28.43%
5Y*
-18.40%
10Y*
14.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACN vs. HUBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACN
Accenture plc
-35.62%-22.14%1.86%33.60%-34.75%60.67%26.04%51.21%-6.23%33.34%
HUBS
HubSpot, Inc.
-53.16%-42.41%20.02%100.79%-56.14%66.27%150.12%26.06%42.23%88.09%

Correlation

The correlation between ACN and HUBS is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2014

0.43

The correlation between ACN and HUBS shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ACN:

$106.02B

HUBS:

$9.88B

EPS

ACN:

$12.27

HUBS:

$1.91

PE Ratio

ACN:

13.88

HUBS:

98.67

PEG Ratio

ACN:

1.89

HUBS:

0.11

PS Ratio

ACN:

1.48

HUBS:

3.00

PB Ratio

ACN:

3.40

HUBS:

4.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACN:

$72.11B

HUBS:

$3.30B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACN:

$23.06B

HUBS:

$2.76B

EBITDA (TTM)

ACN:

$12.11B

HUBS:

$196.96M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACN vs. HUBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACN
ACN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ACN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACN Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACN Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ACN Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACN Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

HUBS
HUBS Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
HUBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUBS Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
HUBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUBS Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACN vs. HUBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Accenture plc (ACN) and HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACNHUBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

0.77

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

-0.99

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.72

-1.66

-0.06

ACN vs. HUBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACN Sharpe Ratio is -1.26, which is comparable to the HUBS Sharpe Ratio of -1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACN and HUBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACN vs. HUBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACN drawdown since its inception was -59.20%, smaller than the maximum HUBS drawdown of -78.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACN and HUBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACNHUBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.20%

-78.99%

+19.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.89%

-68.09%

+20.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.67%

-78.16%

+19.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.67%

-78.99%

+20.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.67%

-78.99%

+20.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.91%

-77.94%

+22.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.89%

-23.21%

+10.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.93%

40.95%

-14.02%

Volatility

ACN vs. HUBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Accenture plc (ACN) is 12.95%, while HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) has a volatility of 27.45%. This indicates that ACN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACNHUBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.95%

27.45%

-14.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.81%

55.03%

-25.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.02%

62.97%

-26.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.60%

55.02%

-26.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.87%

50.98%

-24.11%

Dividends

ACN vs. HUBS - Dividend Comparison

ACN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, while HUBS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACN
Accenture plc
3.74%2.26%1.52%1.33%1.51%0.87%1.26%1.07%1.98%1.66%1.97%2.03%
HUBS
HubSpot, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ACN vs. HUBS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Accenture plc and HubSpot, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
18.04B
881.00M
(ACN) Total Revenue
(HUBS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ACN vs. HUBS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Accenture plc and HubSpot, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
30.3%
83.5%
Portfolio components
ACN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accenture plc reported a gross profit of 5.46B and revenue of 18.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.3%.

HUBS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a gross profit of 735.30M and revenue of 881.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.

ACN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accenture plc reported an operating income of 2.49B and revenue of 18.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.8%.

HUBS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.94M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

ACN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accenture plc reported a net income of 1.86B and revenue of 18.04B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.

HUBS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a net income of 32.55M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ACN and HUBS have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HUBS has higher volatility (27.45%) compared to ACN (12.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACN dropped -59.20% vs HUBS's -78.99%.

HUBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.07 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACN and HUBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer