ACN vs. ETN

In the year-to-date period, ACN achieves a -15.83% return, which is significantly lower than ETN's -12.65% return. Over the past 10 years, ACN has underperformed ETN with an annualized return of 13.99%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively higher 18.54% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Accenture plc (ACN) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ACN Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is comparable to the ETN Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACN and ETN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ACN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than ETN's 1.34% yield.

The maximum ACN drawdown since its inception was -59.20%, smaller than the maximum ETN drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACN and ETN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Accenture plc (ACN) is 12.12%, while Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) has a volatility of 19.30%. This indicates that ACN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Accenture plc and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.