ACN vs. ETN
ACN (Accenture plc) and ETN (Eaton Corporation plc) are both stocks. ACN operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while ETN operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, ACN returned 5.83%/yr vs 23.40%/yr for ETN. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ACN vs. ETN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACN achieves a -36.52% return, which is significantly lower than ETN's 31.12% return. Over the past 10 years, ACN has underperformed ETN with an annualized return of 5.83%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively higher 23.40% annualized return.
ACN
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- 22.25%
- 6M
- -35.77%
- YTD
- -36.52%
- 1Y
- -32.87%
- 3Y*
- -17.93%
- 5Y*
- -10.50%
- 10Y*
- 5.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.85%
ETN
- 1D
- 7.32%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- 6M
- 18.85%
- YTD
- 31.12%
- 1Y
- 10.15%
- 3Y*
- 25.38%
- 5Y*
- 23.26%
- 10Y*
- 23.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.27B | $1.22B | $1.30B | |
| $1.04B | $939.19M | $1.06B |
ACN vs. ETN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACN Accenture plc | -36.52% | -22.14% | 1.86% | 33.60% | -34.75% | 60.67% | 26.04% | 51.21% | -6.23% | 33.34% |
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 31.12% | -2.79% | 39.51% | 56.22% | -7.18% | 46.70% | 29.88% | 42.76% | -10.04% | 21.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACN and ETN is -0.27, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2001 | 0.41 |
The correlation between ACN and ETN shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ACN:
$101.53B
ETN:
$161.22B
ACN:
$12.55
ETN:
$9.83
ACN:
13.22
ETN:
42.23
ACN:
1.80
ETN:
2.29
ACN:
1.42
ETN:
5.39
ACN:
3.20
ETN:
7.98
ACN:
$73.10B
ETN:
$30.03B
ACN:
$23.37B
ETN:
$10.78B
ACN:
$12.30B
ETN:
$6.06B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACN vs. ETN — Risk / Return Rank
ACN
ETN
ACN vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Accenture plc (ACN) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACN | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.07 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | 0.50 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | 1.07 | -2.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACN vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACN drawdown since its inception was -67.78%, roughly equal to the maximum ETN drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACN and ETN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACN | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.78% | -68.95% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.51% | -18.33% | -38.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.78% | -34.46% | -33.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.78% | -34.46% | -33.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.78% | -44.55% | -23.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.52% | -4.72% | -51.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.15% | -14.87% | +1.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.32% | 8.63% | +18.69% |
Volatility
ACN vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison
Accenture plc (ACN) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) have volatilities of 16.25% and 15.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACN | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.25% | 15.81% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.42% | 31.45% | +7.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.67% | 37.69% | +5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.94% | 31.33% | -0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.05% | 30.53% | -2.48% |
Dividends
ACN vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison
ACN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than ETN's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACN Accenture plc | 3.93% | 2.26% | 1.52% | 1.33% | 1.51% | 0.87% | 1.26% | 1.07% | 1.98% | 1.66% | 1.97% | 2.03% |
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 1.03% | 1.31% | 1.13% | 1.43% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 1.88% | 3.00% | 3.85% | 3.04% | 3.40% | 4.23% |
Financials
ACN vs. ETN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Accenture plc and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ACN vs. ETN - Profitability Comparison
ACN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Accenture plc reported a gross profit of 6.13B and revenue of 18.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.8%.
ETN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a gross profit of 2.86B and revenue of 8.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.5%.
ACN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Accenture plc reported an operating income of 3.18B and revenue of 18.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.0%.
ETN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported an operating income of 1.39B and revenue of 8.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.
ACN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Accenture plc reported a net income of 2.34B and revenue of 18.72B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
ETN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a net income of 821.00M and revenue of 8.53B, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACN and ETN have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACN has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to ETN (15.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACN dropped -67.78% vs ETN's -68.95%.
ETN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACN and ETN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer