ABLD vs. TMDV

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV).

ABLD and TMDV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ABLD is a passively managed fund by Abacus that tracks the performance of the FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index. It was launched on Dec 13, 2021. TMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 2019. Both ABLD and TMDV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ABLD vs. TMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ABLD vs. TMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF	10.68%	6.64%	7.05%	18.89%	7.42%	3.86%
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF	4.14%	2.91%	2.64%	2.25%	-5.10%	2.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABLD achieves a 10.68% return, which is significantly higher than TMDV's 4.14% return.

ABLD

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: -5.53%
• YTD: 10.68%
• 6M: 11.86%
• 1Y: 16.10%
• 3Y*: 13.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TMDV

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -6.06%
• YTD: 4.14%
• 6M: 4.03%
• 1Y: 5.15%
• 3Y*: 4.21%
• 5Y*: 3.75%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABLD vs. TMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than TMDV's 0.35% expense ratio.

ABLD

Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF

TMDV

ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF

Return for Risk

ABLD vs. TMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABLD

ABLD Risk / Return Rank: 41
ABLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
ABLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ABLD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
ABLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
ABLD Martin Ratio Rank: 40

TMDV

TMDV Risk / Return Rank: 21
TMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
TMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
TMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 19
TMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
TMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABLD vs. TMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ABLD	TMDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	0.35	+0.52
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	0.61	+0.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.07	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.12	0.49	+0.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.52	1.42	+3.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ABLD vs. TMDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the TMDV Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABLD and TMDV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ABLD	TMDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	0.35	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.31	+0.43

Correlation

The correlation between ABLD and TMDV is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ABLD vs. TMDV - Dividend Comparison

ABLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than TMDV's 2.63% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF	4.12%	2.86%	10.13%	4.70%	8.40%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF	2.63%	2.65%	2.70%	2.45%	2.46%	2.14%	2.28%	0.16%

Drawdowns

ABLD vs. TMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABLD drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, smaller than the maximum TMDV drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLD and TMDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABLD	TMDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.35%	-33.42%	+14.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.67%	-10.52%	-4.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.53%	-6.91%	+1.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.91%	-5.42%	+1.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.63%	3.65%	-0.02%

Volatility

ABLD vs. TMDV - Volatility Comparison

Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) has a higher volatility of 6.81% compared to ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) at 3.78%. This indicates that ABLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABLD	TMDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.81%	3.78%	+3.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.88%	8.35%	+3.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.56%	14.86%	+3.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.59%	14.43%	+3.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.59%	18.78%	-1.19%