ABLD vs. IVOV
Compare and contrast key facts about Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV).
ABLD and IVOV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ABLD is a passively managed fund by Abacus that tracks the performance of the FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index. It was launched on Dec 13, 2021. IVOV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both ABLD and IVOV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ABLD vs. IVOV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ABLD vs. IVOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF | 9.02% | 6.64% | 7.05% | 18.89% | 7.42% | 3.86% |
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 0.93% | 7.61% | 11.53% | 15.38% | -7.20% | 3.61% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABLD achieves a 9.02% return, which is significantly higher than IVOV's 0.93% return.
ABLD
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -6.73%
- YTD
- 9.02%
- 6M
- 10.21%
- 1Y
- 14.65%
- 3Y*
- 13.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVOV
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -5.27%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 2.99%
- 1Y
- 12.76%
- 3Y*
- 10.87%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ABLD vs. IVOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOV's 0.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ABLD vs. IVOV — Risk / Return Rank
ABLD
IVOV
ABLD vs. IVOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABLD | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 0.62 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.18 | 1.02 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.14 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 0.90 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.19 | 3.41 | +0.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABLD | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 0.62 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.55 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between ABLD and IVOV is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ABLD vs. IVOV - Dividend Comparison
ABLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than IVOV's 1.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF | 4.18% | 2.86% | 10.13% | 4.70% | 8.40% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.81% | 1.82% | 1.74% | 1.52% | 1.97% | 1.78% | 2.42% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.66% |
Drawdowns
ABLD vs. IVOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABLD drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, smaller than the maximum IVOV drawdown of -45.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLD and IVOV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABLD | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.35% | -45.99% | +26.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.67% | -14.63% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.95% | -7.64% | +0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -5.46% | +1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 3.86% | -0.25% |
Volatility
ABLD vs. IVOV - Volatility Comparison
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) has a higher volatility of 7.45% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) at 5.32%. This indicates that ABLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ABLD | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.45% | 5.32% | +2.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.80% | 11.46% | +0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.51% | 20.79% | -2.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 19.56% | -1.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 21.73% | -4.15% |