ABLD vs. DXUV

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ABLD (Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF) and DXUV (Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. ABLD is passively managed, while DXUV is actively managed. Over the past year, ABLD returned 11.17% vs 27.33% for DXUV. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ABLD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DXUV.

Performance

ABLD vs. DXUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABLD achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly lower than DXUV's 10.98% return.

ABLD

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -3.12%
• YTD: 5.59%
• 6M: 6.01%
• 1Y: 11.17%
• 3Y*: 11.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DXUV

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 1.13%
• YTD: 10.98%
• 6M: 9.75%
• 1Y: 27.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABLD vs. DXUV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF	5.59%	6.64%	-0.81%
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF	10.98%	14.34%	5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between ABLD and DXUV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2024	0.75

The correlation between ABLD and DXUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ABLD vs. DXUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABLD

ABLD Risk / Return Rank: 21
ABLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
ABLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
ABLD Omega Ratio Rank: 21
ABLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
ABLD Martin Ratio Rank: 23

DXUV

DXUV Risk / Return Rank: 67
DXUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
DXUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
DXUV Omega Ratio Rank: 64
DXUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
DXUV Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABLD vs. DXUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ABLD	DXUV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	2.11	-1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.09	2.94	-1.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.37	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	3.22	-2.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.86	13.02	-10.16

ABLD vs. DXUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the DXUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABLD and DXUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ABLD vs. DXUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABLD drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, smaller than the maximum DXUV drawdown of -21.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLD and DXUV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABLD	DXUV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.35%	-21.08%	+1.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.64%	-8.53%	-3.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.88%	-0.79%	-9.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.01%	-3.02%	-0.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.91%	2.10%	+1.81%

Volatility

ABLD vs. DXUV - Volatility Comparison

Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV) have volatilities of 4.17% and 4.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABLD	DXUV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.17%	4.02%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.17%	9.51%	+3.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.08%	13.01%	+2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.51%	17.29%	+0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.51%	17.29%	+0.22%

ABLD vs. DXUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than DXUV's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABLD vs. DXUV - Dividend Comparison

ABLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than DXUV's 0.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF	4.32%	2.86%	10.13%	4.70%	8.40%	0.08%
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF	0.96%	1.01%	0.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABLD and DXUV in my portfolio?

ABLD and DXUV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABLD or DXUV?

ABLD has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to DXUV (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABLD dropped -19.35% vs DXUV's -21.08%.

Which ETF is better, ABLD or DXUV?

On 1-year performance, DXUV leads with 27.33% vs 11.17% for ABLD. On fees, DXUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DXUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ABLD or DXUV?

Over the 1-year period, DXUV has performed better with a 27.33% return vs 11.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABLD or DXUV?

DXUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ABLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABLD or DXUV?

ABLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.32%, compared with 0.96% for DXUV.

What is the main difference between ABLD and DXUV?

They also come from different issuers: Abacus and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ABLD and 0.25% for DXUV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DXUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.