ABLD vs. DXUV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV).

ABLD and DXUV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ABLD is a passively managed fund by Abacus that tracks the performance of the FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index. It was launched on Dec 13, 2021. DXUV is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Sep 10, 2024.

Performance

ABLD vs. DXUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ABLD vs. DXUV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF	9.02%	6.64%	-1.44%
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF	-0.49%	14.34%	5.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABLD achieves a 9.02% return, which is significantly higher than DXUV's -0.49% return.

ABLD

• 1D: 2.85%
• 1M: -6.73%
• YTD: 9.02%
• 6M: 10.21%
• 1Y: 14.65%
• 3Y*: 13.41%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DXUV

• 1D: 2.61%
• 1M: -4.79%
• YTD: -0.49%
• 6M: 2.12%
• 1Y: 19.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABLD vs. DXUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than DXUV's 0.25% expense ratio.

ABLD

Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF

DXUV

Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF

Return for Risk

ABLD vs. DXUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABLD

ABLD Risk / Return Rank: 41
ABLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
ABLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
ABLD Omega Ratio Rank: 42
ABLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
ABLD Martin Ratio Rank: 43

DXUV

DXUV Risk / Return Rank: 59
DXUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
DXUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
DXUV Omega Ratio Rank: 59
DXUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
DXUV Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABLD vs. DXUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ABLD	DXUV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.80	1.00	-0.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	1.54	-0.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.23	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.03	1.51	-0.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.19	6.86	-2.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ABLD vs. DXUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the DXUV Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABLD and DXUV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ABLD	DXUV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80	1.00	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.69	+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between ABLD and DXUV is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ABLD vs. DXUV - Dividend Comparison

ABLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than DXUV's 1.07% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF	4.18%	2.86%	10.13%	4.70%	8.40%	0.08%
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF	1.07%	1.01%	0.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ABLD vs. DXUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABLD drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, smaller than the maximum DXUV drawdown of -21.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLD and DXUV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABLD	DXUV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.35%	-21.08%	+1.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.67%	-13.38%	-1.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.95%	-6.14%	-0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.91%	-3.31%	-0.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.61%	2.93%	+0.68%

Volatility

ABLD vs. DXUV - Volatility Comparison

Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) has a higher volatility of 7.45% compared to Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV) at 5.09%. This indicates that ABLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABLD	DXUV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.45%	5.09%	+2.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.80%	9.84%	+1.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.51%	19.41%	-0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.58%	17.87%	-0.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.58%	17.87%	-0.29%