ABLD vs. ABFL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL).

ABLD and ABFL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ABLD is a passively managed fund by Abacus that tracks the performance of the FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index. It was launched on Dec 13, 2021. ABFL is an actively managed fund by Abacus. It was launched on Sep 27, 2016.

Performance

ABLD vs. ABFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ABLD vs. ABFL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF	9.02%	6.64%	7.05%	18.89%	7.42%	3.86%
ABFL Abacus FCF Leaders ETF	-0.10%	8.07%	18.26%	22.97%	-14.60%	3.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABLD achieves a 9.02% return, which is significantly higher than ABFL's -0.10% return.

ABLD

• 1D: 2.85%
• 1M: -6.73%
• YTD: 9.02%
• 6M: 10.21%
• 1Y: 14.65%
• 3Y*: 13.41%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ABFL

• 1D: 3.03%
• 1M: -3.07%
• YTD: -0.10%
• 6M: -0.80%
• 1Y: 12.02%
• 3Y*: 14.18%
• 5Y*: 10.27%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABLD vs. ABFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ABFL's 0.49% expense ratio.

ABFL

Abacus FCF Leaders ETF

ABLD

Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF

Return for Risk

ABLD vs. ABFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABLD

ABLD Risk / Return Rank: 41
ABLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
ABLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
ABLD Omega Ratio Rank: 42
ABLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
ABLD Martin Ratio Rank: 43

ABFL

ABFL Risk / Return Rank: 35
ABFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
ABFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
ABFL Omega Ratio Rank: 30
ABFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
ABFL Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABLD vs. ABFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ABLD	ABFL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.80	0.61	+0.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	0.98	+0.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.13	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.03	1.01	+0.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.19	4.45	-0.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ABLD vs. ABFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the ABFL Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABLD and ABFL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ABLD	ABFL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80	0.61	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.69	+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between ABLD and ABFL is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ABLD vs. ABFL - Dividend Comparison

ABLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than ABFL's 0.63% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF	4.18%	2.86%	10.13%	4.70%	8.40%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ABFL Abacus FCF Leaders ETF	0.63%	0.62%	0.70%	0.94%	1.36%	9.63%	0.41%	0.72%	0.62%	0.40%

Drawdowns

ABLD vs. ABFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABLD drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, smaller than the maximum ABFL drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLD and ABFL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABLD	ABFL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.35%	-34.95%	+15.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.67%	-12.12%	-2.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.88%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.95%	-4.31%	-2.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.91%	-5.07%	+1.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.61%	2.75%	+0.86%

Volatility

ABLD vs. ABFL - Volatility Comparison

Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) has a higher volatility of 7.45% compared to Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) at 6.40%. This indicates that ABLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABLD	ABFL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.45%	6.40%	+1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.80%	12.07%	-0.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.51%	19.81%	-1.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.58%	17.00%	+0.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.58%	18.77%	-1.19%