ABI vs. FLTR

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

ABI (VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF) and FLTR (VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ABI is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by VictoryShares, while FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. ABI is actively managed, while FLTR is passively managed. Over the past year, ABI returned 4.92% vs 5.05% for FLTR. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ABI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.

Performance

ABI vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABI achieves a 3.53% return, which is significantly higher than FLTR's 2.78% return.

ABI

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.44%
• 6M: 2.45%
• YTD: 3.53%
• 1Y: 4.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.10%

FLTR

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.35%
• 6M: 2.28%
• YTD: 2.78%
• 1Y: 5.05%
• 3Y*: 5.95%
• 5Y*: 4.64%
• 10Y*: 3.52%
• ALL TIME*: 2.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ABI VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF	$1.97K	$2.86K	$3.58K
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF	$37.49M	$34.31M	$28.87M

ABI vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ABI VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF	3.53%	2.05%
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF	2.78%	3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ABI and FLTR is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.04

Return for Risk

ABI vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ABI

ABI Risk / Return Rank: 95
ABI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
ABI Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
ABI Omega Ratio Rank: 98
ABI Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ABI Martin Ratio Rank: 90

FLTR

FLTR Risk / Return Rank: 99
FLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ABI vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ABI	FLTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.05	6.40	-2.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.97	11.94	-5.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.97	2.96	-1.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.20	16.18	-10.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.77	95.52	-79.75

ABI vs. FLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABI Sharpe Ratio is 4.05, which is lower than the FLTR Sharpe Ratio of 6.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABI and FLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ABI vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABI drawdown since its inception was -0.95%, smaller than the maximum FLTR drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABI and FLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABI	FLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.95%	-17.84%	+16.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.95%	-0.31%	-0.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.93%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-3.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.16%	-0.66%	+0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.31%	0.05%	+0.26%

Volatility

ABI vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI) has a higher volatility of 0.26% compared to VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.18%. This indicates that ABI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABI	FLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.26%	0.18%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.82%	0.64%	+0.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22%	0.79%	+0.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.24%	2.13%	-0.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.24%	5.00%	-3.76%

ABI vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABI vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison

ABI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, more than FLTR's 4.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ABI VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF	6.18%	3.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF	4.57%	4.97%	5.93%	6.07%	2.29%	0.63%	1.49%	3.05%	2.67%	1.69%	1.16%	0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABI and FLTR in my portfolio?

ABI and FLTR have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABI or FLTR?

ABI has higher volatility (0.26%) compared to FLTR (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABI dropped -0.95% vs FLTR's -17.84%.

Which ETF is better, ABI or FLTR?

On 1-year performance, FLTR leads with 5.05% vs 4.92% for ABI. On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ABI or FLTR?

Over the 1-year period, FLTR has performed better with a 5.05% return vs 4.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABI or FLTR?

FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ABI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABI or FLTR?

ABI has the higher dividend yield at 6.18%, compared with 4.57% for FLTR.

What is the main difference between ABI and FLTR?

ABI is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while FLTR is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ABI and 0.14% for FLTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.40 vs 4.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.