ABI vs. RMIF
ABI (VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF) and RMIF (LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past year, ABI returned 5.02% vs 2.58% for RMIF. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ABI charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for RMIF.
Performance
ABI vs. RMIF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABI achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly higher than RMIF's -0.73% return.
ABI
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 3.00%
- 1Y
- 5.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RMIF
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- -0.73%
- 6M
- -0.72%
- 1Y
- 2.58%
- 3Y*
- 4.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABI vs. RMIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ABI VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF | 2.92% | 2.05% |
RMIF LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF | -0.73% | 3.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABI and RMIF is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABI vs. RMIF — Risk / Return Rank
ABI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RMIF
ABI vs. RMIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI) and LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF (RMIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABI | RMIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.10 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.84 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABI vs. RMIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABI drawdown since its inception was -0.95%, smaller than the maximum RMIF drawdown of -3.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABI and RMIF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABI | RMIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.95% | -3.01% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.95% | -2.37% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -1.19% | +1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.18% | -0.40% | +0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.91% | — |
Volatility
ABI vs. RMIF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABI | RMIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27% | 2.64% | -1.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.27% | 2.59% | -1.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.27% | 2.59% | -1.32% |
ABI vs. RMIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than RMIF's 1.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABI vs. RMIF - Dividend Comparison
ABI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%, more than RMIF's 5.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ABI VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF | 5.69% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RMIF LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF | 5.29% | 5.70% | 6.61% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABI and RMIF have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, ABI leads with 5.02% vs 2.58% for RMIF. On fees, ABI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ABI has performed better with a 5.02% return vs 2.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ABI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for RMIF.
ABI has the higher dividend yield at 5.69%, compared with 5.29% for RMIF.
They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and Little Harbor Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ABI and 1.38% for RMIF.
Find the right allocation for ABI and RMIF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer