ABI vs. BLUI

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

ABI (VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF) and BLUI (Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past year, ABI returned 5.02% vs 7.84% for BLUI. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ABI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BLUI.

Performance

ABI vs. BLUI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI) and Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABI achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly lower than BLUI's 3.80% return.

ABI

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: 2.92%
• 6M: 3.00%
• 1Y: 5.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLUI

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 3.80%
• 6M: 3.68%
• 1Y: 7.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABI vs. BLUI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ABI VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF	2.92%	2.05%
BLUI Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF	3.80%	3.90%

Correlation

The correlation between ABI and BLUI is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.38

Return for Risk

ABI vs. BLUI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLUI

BLUI Risk / Return Rank: 76
BLUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
BLUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
BLUI Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BLUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
BLUI Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABI vs. BLUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI) and Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ABI	BLUI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.05	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.02	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.41	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.24	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.15	—

Drawdowns

ABI vs. BLUI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABI drawdown since its inception was -0.95%, smaller than the maximum BLUI drawdown of -2.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABI and BLUI.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABI	BLUI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.95%	-2.43%	+1.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.95%	-2.43%	+1.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	0.00%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.18%	-0.36%	+0.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.56%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ABI	BLUI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.08%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27%	3.88%	-2.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.27%	3.89%	-2.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.27%	3.89%	-2.62%

ABI vs. BLUI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BLUI's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABI vs. BLUI - Dividend Comparison

ABI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%, more than BLUI's 4.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ABI VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF	5.69%	3.01%
BLUI Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF	4.69%	2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABI and BLUI in my portfolio?

ABI and BLUI have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ABI or BLUI?

On 1-year performance, BLUI leads with 7.84% vs 5.02% for ABI. On fees, ABI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ABI or BLUI?

Over the 1-year period, BLUI has performed better with a 7.84% return vs 5.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABI or BLUI?

ABI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BLUI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABI or BLUI?

ABI has the higher dividend yield at 5.69%, compared with 4.69% for BLUI.

What is the main difference between ABI and BLUI?

They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ABI and 0.75% for BLUI.